📄 dive_1.c
字号:
/* mpn_divexact_1 -- mpn by limb exact division. THE FUNCTIONS IN THIS FILE ARE FOR INTERNAL USE ONLY. THEY'RE ALMOST CERTAIN TO BE SUBJECT TO INCOMPATIBLE CHANGES OR DISAPPEAR COMPLETELY IN FUTURE GNU MP RELEASES.Copyright 2000, 2001, 2002 Free Software Foundation, Inc.This file is part of the GNU MP Library.The GNU MP Library is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modifyit under the terms of the GNU Lesser General Public License as published bythe Free Software Foundation; either version 2.1 of the License, or (at youroption) any later version.The GNU MP Library is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, butWITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of MERCHANTABILITYor FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU Lesser General PublicLicense for more details.You should have received a copy of the GNU Lesser General Public Licensealong with the GNU MP Library; see the file COPYING.LIB. If not, write tothe Free Software Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place - Suite 330, Boston,MA 02111-1307, USA. */#include "gmp.h"#include "gmp-impl.h"#include "longlong.h"/* Divide a={src,size} by d=divisor and store the quotient in q={dst,size}. q will only be correct if d divides a exactly. A separate loop is used for shift==0 because n<<BITS_PER_MP_LIMB doesn't give zero on all CPUs (for instance it doesn't on the x86s). This separate loop might run faster too, helping odd divisors. Possibilities: mpn_divexact_1c could be created, accepting and returning c. This would let a long calculation be done piece by piece. Currently there's no particular need for that, and not returning c means that a final umul can be skipped. Another use for returning c would be letting the caller know whether the division was in fact exact. It would work just to return the carry bit "c=(l>s)" and let the caller do a final umul if interested. When the divisor is even, the factors of two could be handled with a separate mpn_rshift, instead of shifting on the fly. That might be faster on some CPUs and would mean just the shift==0 style loop would be needed. If n<<BITS_PER_MP_LIMB gives zero on a particular CPU then the separate shift==0 loop is unnecessary, and could be eliminated if there's no great speed difference. It's not clear whether "/" is the best way to handle size==1. Alpha gcc 2.95 for instance has a poor "/" and might prefer the modular method. Perhaps a tuned parameter should control this. If src[size-1] < divisor then dst[size-1] will be zero, and one divide step could be skipped. A test at last step for s<divisor (or ls in the even case) might be a good way to do that. But if this code is often used with small divisors then it might not be worth bothering */voidmpn_divexact_1 (mp_ptr dst, mp_srcptr src, mp_size_t size, mp_limb_t divisor){ mp_size_t i; mp_limb_t c, l, ls, s, s_next, inverse, dummy; unsigned shift; ASSERT (size >= 1); ASSERT (divisor != 0); ASSERT (MPN_SAME_OR_SEPARATE_P (dst, src, size)); ASSERT_MPN (src, size); ASSERT_LIMB (divisor); if (size == 1) { dst[0] = src[0] / divisor; return; } if ((divisor & 1) == 0) { count_trailing_zeros (shift, divisor); divisor >>= shift; } else shift = 0; modlimb_invert (inverse, divisor); divisor <<= GMP_NAIL_BITS; if (shift != 0) { s = src[0]; c = 0; i = 0; size--; goto even_entry; do { umul_ppmm (l, dummy, l, divisor); c += l; even_entry: s_next = src[i+1]; ls = ((s >> shift) | (s_next << (GMP_NUMB_BITS-shift))) & GMP_NUMB_MASK; s = s_next; SUBC_LIMB (c, l, ls, c); l = (l * inverse) & GMP_NUMB_MASK; dst[i] = l; i++; } while (i < size); umul_ppmm (l, dummy, l, divisor); c += l; ls = s >> shift; l = ls - c; l = (l * inverse) & GMP_NUMB_MASK; dst[i] = l; } else { l = src[0]; l = (l * inverse) & GMP_NUMB_MASK; dst[0] = l; i = 1; c = 0; do { umul_ppmm (l, dummy, l, divisor); c += l; s = src[i]; SUBC_LIMB (c, l, s, c); l = (l * inverse) & GMP_NUMB_MASK; dst[i] = l; i++; } while (i < size); }}
⌨️ 快捷键说明
复制代码
Ctrl + C
搜索代码
Ctrl + F
全屏模式
F11
切换主题
Ctrl + Shift + D
显示快捷键
?
增大字号
Ctrl + =
减小字号
Ctrl + -