⭐ 欢迎来到虫虫下载站! | 📦 资源下载 📁 资源专辑 ℹ️ 关于我们
⭐ 虫虫下载站

📄 pre_divrem_1.c

📁 a very popular packet of cryptography tools,it encloses the most common used algorithm and protocols
💻 C
字号:
/* mpn_preinv_divrem_1 -- mpn by limb division with pre-inverted divisor.Copyright 2000, 2001, 2002 Free Software Foundation, Inc.This file is part of the GNU MP Library.The GNU MP Library is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modifyit under the terms of the GNU Lesser General Public License as published bythe Free Software Foundation; either version 2.1 of the License, or (at youroption) any later version.The GNU MP Library is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, butWITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of MERCHANTABILITYor FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  See the GNU Lesser General PublicLicense for more details.You should have received a copy of the GNU Lesser General Public Licensealong with the GNU MP Library; see the file COPYING.LIB.  If not, write tothe Free Software Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place - Suite 330, Boston,MA 02111-1307, USA. */#include "gmp.h"#include "gmp-impl.h"#include "longlong.h"/* Don't bloat a shared library with unused code. */#if USE_PREINV_DIVREM_1/* Same test here for skipping one divide step as in mpn_divrem_1.   The main reason for a separate shift==0 case is that not all CPUs give   zero for "n0 >> BITS_PER_MP_LIMB" which would arise in the general case   code used on shift==0.  shift==0 is also reasonably common in __mp_bases   big_base, for instance base==10 on a 64-bit limb.   Under shift!=0 it would be possible to call mpn_lshift to adjust the   dividend all in one go (into the quotient space say), rather than   limb-by-limb in the loop.  This might help if mpn_lshift is a lot faster   than what the compiler can generate for EXTRACT.  But this is left to CPU   specific implementations to consider, especially since EXTRACT isn't on   the dependent chain.   If size==0 then the result is simply xsize limbs of zeros, but nothing   special is done for that, since it wouldn't be a usual call, and   certainly never arises from mpn_get_str which is our main caller.  */mp_limb_tmpn_preinv_divrem_1 (mp_ptr qp, mp_size_t xsize,		     mp_srcptr ap, mp_size_t size, mp_limb_t d_unnorm,		     mp_limb_t dinv, int shift){  mp_limb_t  ahigh, qhigh, r;  mp_size_t  i;  mp_limb_t  n1, n0;  mp_limb_t  d;  ASSERT (xsize >= 0);  ASSERT (size >= 1);  ASSERT (d_unnorm != 0);#if WANT_ASSERT  {    int        want_shift;    mp_limb_t  want_dinv;    count_leading_zeros (want_shift, d_unnorm);    ASSERT (shift == want_shift);    invert_limb (want_dinv, d_unnorm << shift);    ASSERT (dinv == want_dinv);  }#endif  /* FIXME: What's the correct overlap rule when xsize!=0? */  ASSERT (MPN_SAME_OR_SEPARATE_P (qp+xsize, ap, size));  ahigh = ap[size-1];  d = d_unnorm << shift;  qp += (size + xsize - 1);   /* dest high limb */  if (shift == 0)    {      /* High quotient limb is 0 or 1, and skip a divide step. */      r = ahigh;      qhigh = (r >= d);      r = (qhigh ? r-d : r);      *qp-- = qhigh;      size--;      for (i = size-1; i >= 0; i--)	{	  n0 = ap[i];	  udiv_qrnnd_preinv (*qp, r, r, n0, d, dinv);	  qp--;	}    }  else    {      r = 0;      if (ahigh < d_unnorm)	{	  r = ahigh << shift;	  *qp-- = 0;	  size--;	  if (size == 0)	    goto done_integer;	}      n1 = ap[size-1];      r |= n1 >> (BITS_PER_MP_LIMB - shift);      for (i = size-2; i >= 0; i--)	{	  ASSERT (r < d);	  n0 = ap[i];	  udiv_qrnnd_preinv (*qp, r, r,			     ((n1 << shift) | (n0 >> (BITS_PER_MP_LIMB - shift))),			     d, dinv);	  qp--;	  n1 = n0;	}      udiv_qrnnd_preinv (*qp, r, r, n1 << shift, d, dinv);      qp--;    } done_integer:  for (i = 0; i < xsize; i++)    {      udiv_qrnnd_preinv (*qp, r, r, 0, d, dinv);      qp--;    }  return r >> shift;}#endif /* USE_PREINV_DIVREM_1 */

⌨️ 快捷键说明

复制代码 Ctrl + C
搜索代码 Ctrl + F
全屏模式 F11
切换主题 Ctrl + Shift + D
显示快捷键 ?
增大字号 Ctrl + =
减小字号 Ctrl + -