76233

神经网络昆斯林的新闻组分类2006

Xref: cantaloupe.srv.cs.cmu.edu talk.politics.mideast:76233 talk.politics.misc:179455
Path: cantaloupe.srv.cs.cmu.edu!crabapple.srv.cs.cmu.edu!fs7.ece.cmu.edu!europa.eng.gtefsd.com!emory!swrinde!cs.utexas.edu!usc!news.service.uci.edu!orion.oac.uci.edu!tclock
From: [e-mail] (Tim Clock)
Subject: Re: Israel's Expansion II
Nntp-Posting-Host: orion.oac.uci.edu
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: talk.politics.mideast,talk.politics.misc
Organization: University of California, Irvine
Lines: 20
Date: 22 Apr 93 06:59:12 GMT
References: <[e-mail]> <[e-mail]> <[e-mail]>

In article <[e-mail]> Paul H. Pimentel <[e-mail]> writes:
>What gives Isreal the right to keep Jeruseleum?It is the home of the muslim a
>s well as jewish religion, among others.Heck, nobody ever mentions what Yitza
>k Shamir did forty orfifty yearsago which is terrorize westerners much in the
> way Abdul Nidal does today.Seems Isrealis are nowhere above Arabs, so theref
>ore they have a right to Jerusaleum as much as Isreal does.

If "ownership" were rightly based on "worthiness" there wouldn't be any owners.
What is your point?

As I understand it, Israel's "claim" on Jerusalem is based on 1) possession,
and 2) the absolutely CENTRAL (not second, not third) role it plays in jewish 
identity. 


--
______________________________________________________________________________
Tim Clock                                 Ph.D./Graduate student
[[e-mail]]                Department of Politics and Society
"We have met the                          tel:[phone]/Fax:[phone]