📄 76249
字号:
Xref: cantaloupe.srv.cs.cmu.edu talk.politics.misc:179488 talk.politics.mideast:76249Newsgroups: talk.politics.misc,talk.politics.mideastPath: cantaloupe.srv.cs.cmu.edu!magnesium.club.cc.cmu.edu!news.sei.cmu.edu!fs7.ece.cmu.edu!europa.eng.gtefsd.com!howland.reston.ans.net!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!sdd.hp.com!apollo.hp.com!netnewsFrom: nelson_p@apollo.hp.com (Peter Nelson)Subject: Re: Remember those names come election time.Sender: usenet@apollo.hp.com (Usenet News)Message-ID: <C62881.Itu@apollo.hp.com>Date: Sun, 25 Apr 1993 22:09:37 GMTReferences: <C5syr3.G03@newsflash.concordia.ca> <C5u4qI.Mz4@apollo.hp.com> <C5ztEt.Dwz.1@cs.cmu.edu>Nntp-Posting-Host: c.ch.apollo.hp.comOrganization: Hewlett-Packard Corporation, Chelmsford, MAKeywords: usa federal, government, international, non-usa governmentLines: 39In article <C5ztEt.Dwz.1@cs.cmu.edu> anwar+@cs.cmu.edu (Anwar Mohammed) writes:>In article <C5u4qI.Mz4@apollo.hp.com> nelson_p@apollo.hp.com (Peter Nelson) writes:>> >> BTW, with Bosnia's large Moslem population, why have nations like >> Turkey, Saudi Arabia, Syria, Egypt, and others with either money >> or strong military forces not spoken out more forcibly or offered >> to help out Bosnia? >>Obviously, you really don't know.>>They *have* spoken out (cf Sec'y of State Christopher's recent trip to the ME), Note the clause "more forcibly", above. My point is that they have made a few pro-forma, perfunctory remarks, and sent in a few C-130's and so forth, but it's clearly not something they're losing much sleep over. They're just going through the motions, while Moslems are being "ethnically cleansed" out of what used to be Yugoslavia. The US has been speaking out far more loudly than the Moslem nations in the UN and other world forums.>> Besides, there's no case that can be made for US military involvement>> there that doesn't apply equally well to, say, Liberia, Angola, or>> (it appears with the Khmer Rouge's new campaign) Cambodia. Non-whites>> don't count?>>Hmm...some might say Kuwaitis are non-white. Ooops, I forgot, Kuwaitis are>"oil rich", "loaded with petro-dollars", etc so they don't count. Precisely. Humanitarian concerns were not the primary justification for US involvement in the Gulf - oil and geopolitics were. If the the Kuwaitis didn't have oil (and assuming Iraq still saw fit to invade them) I doubt you would have seen Operation Desert Storm.---peter
⌨️ 快捷键说明
复制代码
Ctrl + C
搜索代码
Ctrl + F
全屏模式
F11
切换主题
Ctrl + Shift + D
显示快捷键
?
增大字号
Ctrl + =
减小字号
Ctrl + -