104665

神经网络昆斯林的新闻组分类2006

Newsgroups: rec.sport.baseball
Path: cantaloupe.srv.cs.cmu.edu!magnesium.club.cc.cmu.edu!news.sei.cmu.edu!cis.ohio-state.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!caen!batcomputer!cornell!tedward
From: [e-mail] (Edward [Ted] Fischer)
Subject: Re: Jack Morris
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Organization: Cornell Univ. CS Dept, Ithaca NY 14853
References: <[e-mail]> <[e-mail]> <[e-mail]>
Date: Tue, 20 Apr 1993 16:37:54 GMT
Lines: 20

In article <[e-mail]> [e-mail] (Roger Maynard) writes:
>>(BTW, by my definitions,
>>the "best" player is the one who does the most things to help his team
>>win. I will allow that this could vary depending on who else is on the
>>team, by having aptitudes one team needs more than others.)
>
>Well then given your definition of "best" is it not conceivable that
>Alfredo Griffin could bring something to a team that that team needs
>to win while Larkin might not have that something the team needs?

No.  I do not find this conceivable.  I also cannot conceive of the
possibility that there is any hypothetical team which Morris would
help more than Clemens.

>Would Griffin then be better than Larkin?

Given your premise, yes.  But you are alone in your ability to
conceive of that premise.

-Valentine