📄 21799
字号:
Xref: cantaloupe.srv.cs.cmu.edu soc.religion.christian:21799Path: cantaloupe.srv.cs.cmu.edu!magnesium.club.cc.cmu.edu!pitt.edu!gatech!europa.eng.gtefsd.com!howland.reston.ans.net!usc!rutgers!igor.rutgers.edu!athos.rutgers.edu!christianFrom: Mike.Hahn@p57.f714.n7102.z5.fidonet.org (Mike Hahn)Newsgroups: soc.religion.christianSubject: The doctrine of Original SinMessage-ID: <May.23.04.55.47.1993.20015@athos.rutgers.edu>Date: 23 May 93 08:55:49 GMTSender: hedrick@athos.rutgers.eduLines: 32Approved: christian@aramis.rutgers.eduStephen A. Creps writes to All:[...] SAC> Also, we know that SAC> the Bible says that _everyone_ must be baptized to enter Heaven.Where exactly does it say that? SAC> _Everyone_ includes infants, unless there is other Scripture to the SAC> contrary, i.e. an exception. Since there is no exception listed in the SAC> Bible, we must assume (to be on the safe side) that the Bible means what SAC> it says, that _everyone_ must be baptized to enter Heaven.I think we do see an exception in the case of Cornelius and hishousehold, mentioned in Acts. Of course, they were baptised, but onlyafter "God showed that He accepted them by giving them the HolySpirit". This means they were already acceptable to God before theirbaptism, and had they suddenly died they would have gone to heaven.In case that seems far-fetched - an ancestor of mine was a missionarywho worked among the Hereros in Namibia. Some of the tribesmen werejealous of Christianity, and they poisoned the first convert before hecould be baptised. Surely he still went to heaven? I'm inclined toagree with a comment recorded at the time: "It is not the neglect ofbaptism, but its contempt, that condemns."Mike-- INTERNET: Mike.Hahn@p57.f714.n7102.z5.fidonet.orgvia: THE CATALYST BBS in Port Elizabeth, South Africa. (catpe.alt.za) +27-41-34-2859, V32bis & HST.
⌨️ 快捷键说明
复制代码
Ctrl + C
搜索代码
Ctrl + F
全屏模式
F11
切换主题
Ctrl + Shift + D
显示快捷键
?
增大字号
Ctrl + =
减小字号
Ctrl + -