21493

神经网络昆斯林的新闻组分类2006

Path: cantaloupe.srv.cs.cmu.edu!magnesium.club.cc.cmu.edu!eddie.mit.edu!news.mtholyoke.edu!nic.umass.edu!caen!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!news.kei.com!ub!rutgers!igor.rutgers.edu!athos.rutgers.edu!christian
From: [e-mail] (Paul Hudson Jr)
Newsgroups: soc.religion.christian
Subject: Re: Portland earthquake
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Date: 11 May 93 06:38:46 GMT
Sender: [e-mail]
Organization: University of Georgia, Athens
Lines: 19
Approved: [e-mail]

In article <[e-mail]> [e-mail] (Bill Rea) writes:
>in history seems to imply some pretty serious sin. The one of the 
>pastors in the church I attend, Christchurch City Elim, considers 
>that a prophesy of a natural disaster as a "judgement from the Lord" 
>is a clear sign that the "prophesy" is not from the Lord. 

I would like to see his reasoning behind this.  You may have gotten 
"burned" by natural disaster prophecies down there, but that
does not mean that every natural disaster/judgement prophecy is
false.  Take a quick look at the book of Jeremiah and it is obvious
that judgement prophecies can be valid.  here in the US, it seems like
we might have more of a problem with positive prophecies, though I
am sure there may be a few people who are too into judgement.

Sometimes God does give words that are difficult to swallow.  The
relative positiveness of a prophecy is not necesarily grounds to
dismiss it.  Much of the OT is not happy stuff.

Link Hudson.