21672

神经网络昆斯林的新闻组分类2006

Xref: cantaloupe.srv.cs.cmu.edu soc.religion.christian:21672
Path: cantaloupe.srv.cs.cmu.edu!das-news.harvard.edu!noc.near.net!howland.reston.ans.net!darwin.sura.net!bogus.sura.net!news-feed-1.peachnet.edu!concert!rutgers!igor.rutgers.edu!geneva.rutgers.edu!christian
From: [e-mail] (Stan Friesen)
Newsgroups: soc.religion.christian
Subject: Re: What WAS the immaculate conception
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Date: 18 May 93 04:55:39 GMT
Sender: [e-mail]
Reply-To: [e-mail]
Lines: 28
Approved: [e-mail]

[Someone quoted the following.  I've removed the name because it's not
clear which name goes with which level of quote.  --clh]

>     ... And to Holy Mary, Virgin is invariably added, for that Holy Woman
>     remains undefiled.
>                 -- St. Epiphanus of Salamis, "Panacea against all heresies",
>                    between A.D. 374-377.

>     ... For the Lord Jesus would not have chosen
>     to be born of a virgin if He had judged that she would be so incontinent
>     as to taint the birthplace of the Body of the Lord, home of the Eternal
>     King, with the seed of human intercourse.  ...
>                 -- Pope St. Siricius, Letter to Anysius, Bishop of 
>                    Thessalonica, A.D. 392

On the basis of these examples I would say that Joe Moore was only wrong
in claiming Augustine as a prime mover of the sin=sex view.  These quotes
clearly equate sexuality with defilement and incontinance, even within
the marriage relationship (else they would not apply to Mary after her marriage
to Joseph).

So Joe's assignment of the reasoning behind the concept of the perpetual
virginity of Mary does seem to be supported by these quotes.

-- 
[e-mail]			(formerly tdatirv!sarima)
  or
[e-mail]