20603

神经网络昆斯林的新闻组分类2006

Path: cantaloupe.srv.cs.cmu.edu!rochester!udel!gatech!howland.reston.ans.net!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!dziuxsolim.rutgers.edu!igor.rutgers.edu!athos.rutgers.edu!christian
From: [e-mail]
Newsgroups: soc.religion.christian
Subject: Re: Ancient Books
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Date: 13 Apr 93 04:09:02 GMT
Sender: [e-mail]
Organization: University of Kansas Academic Computing Services
Lines: 20
Approved: [e-mail]

In article <[e-mail]>, [e-mail] (Cardinal Ximenez) writes:

>   I don't think it's possible to convince atheists of the validity of 
> Christianity through argument.  We have to help foster faith and an
> understanding of God.  I could be wrong--are there any former atheists here
> who were led to Christianity by argument?

This is an excellent question and I'll be anxious to see if there are
any such cases.  I doubt it.  In the medieval period (esp. 10th-cent.
when Aquinas flourished) argument was a useful tool because everyone
"knew the rules."  Today, when you can't count on people knowing even
the basics of logic or seeing through rhetoric, a good argument is
often indistinguishable from a poor one.

Sorry; just one of my perennial gripes...<:->

Ken
-- 
[e-mail] | Nobody can explain everything to everybody.
opinions are my own      | G. K. Chesterton