53769

神经网络昆斯林的新闻组分类2006

Newsgroups: rec.sport.hockey
Path: cantaloupe.srv.cs.cmu.edu!das-news.harvard.edu!noc.near.net!howland.reston.ans.net!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!cs.utexas.edu!utnut!torn!newshub.ccs.yorku.ca!ists!stpl.ists.ca!dchhabra
From: [e-mail] (Deepak Chhabra)
Subject: Re: hawks vs leafs lastnight
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Sender: [e-mail] (News Subsystem)
Nntp-Posting-Host: stpl.ists.ca
Organization: Solar Terresterial Physics Laboratory, ISTS
References: <[e-mail]> <[e-mail]>
Distribution: na
Date: Mon, 19 Apr 1993 21:47:52 GMT
Lines: 18

In article <[e-mail]> [e-mail] (Gerald Olchowy) writes:

>>on all replays, joe murphy's goal shouldn't have counted ! 
>>the game would have ended in 2-2 tie !

>I thought the red light went on...thus, in the review, the presumption
>would be to find conclusive evidence that the puck did not go in the
>net...from the replays I say, even from the rear, the evidence wasn't
>conclusive that the puck was in or out...in my opinion...

I was under the impression that the objective is to find conclusive
evidence that the puck _did_ cross the line.  And, the replays I saw showed 
fairly conclusively that the puck did _not_ cross the goal line at any
time anyway.  Somebody screwed up.  


[e-mail]