51652

神经网络昆斯林的新闻组分类2006

Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.hardware
Path: cantaloupe.srv.cs.cmu.edu!crabapple.srv.cs.cmu.edu!bb3.andrew.cmu.edu!news.sei.cmu.edu!cis.ohio-state.edu!pacific.mps.ohio-state.edu!linac!uwm.edu!cs.utexas.edu!sdd.hp.com!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!ames!haven.umd.edu!darwin.sura.net!dtix.dt.navy.mil!relay-wo!relay!paulmac.nswc.navy.mil!user
From: [e-mail] (Paul Montanaro)
Subject: Re: IIci -> Q700 upgrade?
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Followup-To: comp.sys.mac.hardware
Sender: [e-mail]
Organization: NSWC
References: <[e-mail]> <[e-mail]>
Date: Fri, 16 Apr 1993 20:43:29 GMT
Lines: 44

In article <[e-mail]>,
[e-mail] (Gregory Dudek) wrote:
> 
> In article <[e-mail]> $[e-mail] writes:
> >
> >A while ago I posted a note asking for specs on the Quadra 700, and opinions on
> >the Q700 upgrade of a IIci vs. an accelerator card.  So far no responsed that
> >I've noticed.  Please let me know what you think of these possible upgrade
> >paths:  Cost, efficiency, pros/cons, etc.. Thanks!
> 
>   Complete Q700 are best obtained from your dealer or some recent
> copy of MacWorld or MacUser.  My foggy memory suggests that the most relevant
> comparison factors vis-a-vis a IIci are as follows:
> 
>   25 MHz 68040
>   16 Mhz data path (don't recall this for sure, but it's slower
>       than Q 950 style machines for sure).
>   Ethertalk card on-board
>   Audio in/out
>   4 MB RAM on motherboard
>   4 SIMM slots
>   2 NuBus slots.
>   More flexible build-in video than the CI.  Uses VRAM.
> 
> In comparison, a IIci with an accelerator won't give you
>   audio or ethernet  or the same video options.
>   With a 68040 accelerator, CPU performance can be comparable but I
>   think it ends up costing more.
> 
> Greg Dudek

  Actually, an accelerator such as the Daystar 33 MHz 68040 is cheaper than
upgrading to a Q700 (25 MHz).  The accelerator costs about $1400 whereas
the upgrade costs $2131 (just quoted from my dealer).  However the Q700
upgrade gives you very fast built in video that supports monitors up to 21"
with 8 bit depth and up to 16" at 24 bit depth (with additional VRAM).  It
also has a SCSI port capable of a much faster throughput than the CI, which
makes a big difference if you have a fast hard drive.

  If the improved video and SCSI features are important to you, you're
better off getting the Q700 upgrade, otherwise save some money and get an
accelerator.

Paul