178939

神经网络昆斯林的新闻组分类2006

Xref: cantaloupe.srv.cs.cmu.edu talk.politics.misc:178939 alt.politics.clinton:29451 alt.fan.rush-limbaugh:23115
Newsgroups: talk.politics.misc,alt.politics.clinton,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
Path: cantaloupe.srv.cs.cmu.edu!das-news.harvard.edu!noc.near.net!howland.reston.ans.net!gatech!nntp.msstate.edu!Ra.MsState.Edu!fpa1
From: [e-mail] (Fletcher P Adams)
Subject: Pork ( C-17 & C-5 was (Re: ABOLISH SELECTIVE SERVICE )
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Oanization: Mississippi State University
Sender: [e-mail]
Nntp-Posting-Host: ra.msstate.edu
Organization: Mississippi State University
Date: Fri, 16 Apr 1993 17:43:04 GMT
Lines: 30

[e-mail] (Marc Mueller) writes:
>[e-mail] (Fletcher P Adams) writes:
>>>
>>>Eliminate the C-17 transport. 
>>
>>Wrong.  We need its capability.  Sure it has its problems, ........
>
>If you read Aviation Week, the C-5 line can be reopened and the C-5s
>would be delivered a year earlier and cost a billion less for the 
>program. Politically, though, the C-17 is popular pork.

I do read Av Week and don't remember this.  Could you supply the date
of the magazine?  As for C-17 vs. C-5 , the C-17 can't carry as much
but has more capability ( read : can land at smaller airfields of which
there are more of ) than the C-5.  Now is the C-17 pork?  It depends
on whether your job relies on it or not.  :)  In California right now,
I would say that it is not pork since due to peace dividend so many 
people are out of work. 

>The question is whether Les Aspin and Clinton will be able to face down
>a pork happy Congress.
>
>-- Marc Mueller

Huh?  Shouldn't that read "The question is whether a social-pork happy
Les Aspin and Clinton will be able to face down a jobs-pork happy
Congress."

fpa