176904

神经网络昆斯林的新闻组分类2006

Xref: cantaloupe.srv.cs.cmu.edu alt.politics.clinton:28802 talk.politics.misc:176904 soc.history:20523
Path: cantaloupe.srv.cs.cmu.edu!das-news.harvard.edu!ogicse!uwm.edu!wupost!uunet!optilink!cramer
From: [e-mail] (Clayton Cramer)
Newsgroups: alt.politics.clinton,talk.politics.misc,soc.history
Subject: Re: Lincoln & slavery (Re: Top Ten Tricks You Can Play on the American Voter)
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Date: 5 Apr 93 20:30:48 GMT
Article-I.D.: optilink.15238
References: <[e-mail]> <[e-mail]>
Organization: Optilink Corporation, Petaluma, CA
Lines: 16

In article <[e-mail]>, [e-mail] (Gary Livingston Hewitt) writes:
> In article <[e-mail]> [e-mail] (Craig Depken) writes:
> [to which is concluded...]
> >The South only wanted FREE TRADE!!! 
> 
> No, they wanted slavery.  If free trade was in their economic interests
> under that regime (which it was), then free trade they wanted too.  But

> Gary L Hewitt                          [e-mail]

Of course, free trade and slavery don't make much sense together in
a phrase anyway.  Perhaps Mr. Depken meant, "low import tariffs," but
that is quite a bit less than "free trade."
-- 
Clayton E. Cramer {uunet,pyramid}!optilink!cramer  My opinions, all mine!
Relations between people to be by mutual consent, or not at all.