176916

神经网络昆斯林的新闻组分类2006

Xref: cantaloupe.srv.cs.cmu.edu alt.activism:42379 alt.conspiracy:21387 alt.society.sovereign:180 talk.politics.misc:176916 misc.legal:59983
Path: cantaloupe.srv.cs.cmu.edu!rochester!news.crd.ge.com!rpi!uwm.edu!wupost!uunet!olivea!charnel!charnel!zippy
From: [e-mail] (The Pinhead)
Newsgroups: alt.activism,alt.conspiracy,alt.society.sovereign,talk.politics.misc,misc.legal
Subject: Re: Formal Rebuttal to the Presumption of Jurisdiction
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Date: 6 Apr 93 04:45:48 GMT
References: <[e-mail]>
	<[e-mail]>
Organization: California State University, Chico
Lines: 21
NNTP-Posting-Host: hairball.ecst.csuchico.edu
In-reply-to: [e-mail]'s message of 05 Apr 1993 06:48:53 PST

In article <[e-mail]> [e-mail] (Dan Breslau) writes:
   ... an amazing illustration of disconnection from reality.

Glad to see that you agree that the current Government is reticent
about admitting the sovereignty of the people!  Speaking from personal
experience, I have had judges illegally assume jurisdiction even after
I demanded that the DA prove such jurisdiction on the record, and the
DA stood mute.  I have also had an appellate court uphold such action
and hide behind California Rules of Court, Rule 106 ("The judges of
the appellate department shall not be required to write opinions in
any cases decided by them, but may do so whenever they deem it
advisable or in the public interest.").  That is reality, I agree.




--
Ronald Cole                                     E-mail: [e-mail]
Senior Software Engineer                        Phone: [phone]
OPTX International                              
            "The Bill Of Rights -- Void Where Prohibited By Law"