178887

神经网络昆斯林的新闻组分类2006

Xref: cantaloupe.srv.cs.cmu.edu talk.politics.misc:178887 alt.sex:111696 soc.men:68705
Path: cantaloupe.srv.cs.cmu.edu!crabapple.srv.cs.cmu.edu!fs7.ece.cmu.edu!europa.eng.gtefsd.com!howland.reston.ans.net!usc!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!optilink!cramer
From: [e-mail] (Clayton Cramer)
Newsgroups: talk.politics.misc,alt.sex,soc.men
Subject: Re: New Study Out On Gay Percentage
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Date: 19 Apr 93 17:22:47 GMT
References: <[e-mail]> <[e-mail]>
Organization: Optilink Corporation, Petaluma, CA
Lines: 30

In article <[e-mail]>, [e-mail] (Elf Sternberg) writes:
> In article <[e-mail]>
>      [e-mail] (Ryan C Scharfy) writes:
# #Actually, I bet you more gay/bi men are as not as promiscuous as gay men, 
# #because more of them could have the "option" of living a straight life, and 
# #with social pressures, probably would at least try.
# 
#    Geez, where have you been, Ryan?  I proposed this theory *months*
# ago.  Let's take it one step further, even.  If, as the surveys show,
# up to 33% of all men have *had* a homosexual encounter, then there must

Cite a survey, other than the obviously bogus Kinsey studies.

# be an even *larger* percentage of people who have had homosexual erotic
# fantasies.  But if less than 10% of the population is gay, what can we
# say about these people who don't identify as gay but have demonstrated
# gay potential.  Obviously, a large chunk of these people *chose* (or,
# more accurately, were forced to choose by force of religion and social
# sanction) to put those feelings aside, to be heterosexual.
# 
#    Obviously, Cramer and Kaldis fall into this category.

I can't speak for Kaldis; but "force of religion and social sanction"
played no part in my sexual preferences.  Neither had much influence on
me as a teenager.

# [e-mail]  (Elf Sternberg)
-- 
Clayton E. Cramer {uunet,pyramid}!optilink!cramer  My opinions, all mine!
Relations between people to be by mutual consent, or not at all.