📄 178682
字号:
Xref: cantaloupe.srv.cs.cmu.edu alt.activism:42840 talk.politics.misc:178682Path: cantaloupe.srv.cs.cmu.edu!magnesium.club.cc.cmu.edu!news.sei.cmu.edu!fs7.ece.cmu.edu!europa.eng.gtefsd.com!howland.reston.ans.net!usc!cs.utexas.edu!tamsun.tamu.edu!rigel.tamu.edu!mst4298From: mst4298@rigel.tamu.edu (Mitchell S Todd)Newsgroups: alt.activism,talk.politics.miscSubject: Re: Welcome to Police State USADate: 20 Apr 1993 12:32 CSTOrganization: GrinchCoLines: 26Distribution: worldMessage-ID: <20APR199312325032@rigel.tamu.edu>References: <C5rusq.M6M@news.cso.uiuc.edu> <1993Apr20.030234.66491@cc.usu.edu> <C5sI9G.Hx@dscomsa.desy.de> <1993Apr20.151753.13020@udel.edu>NNTP-Posting-Host: rigel.tamu.eduNews-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41 In article <1993Apr20.151753.13020@udel.edu>, carroll@hercules.cis.udel.edu (Mark C. Carroll) writes...>Wait a second, you're ignoring major facts here.>There was NO attempt to simply serve a warrant. The BATF had a>no-knock warrant. The initial firefight began when the BATF threw>concussion grenades at the building. (BATF admits this!) When did the BATF say this? Everything I've seen from the BATF, from the official version to the dissident statements of BATF officers who conducted the raid claims that the Davidians were shooting at the agents long before they were within grenade range. Also, if the warrant is sealed, how do we know it was a 'no-knock'? _____ _____ \\\\\\/ ___/___________________ Mitchell S Todd \\\\/ / _____/__________________________________________ \\/ / mst4298@zeus._____/.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'_'_'_/\_____ \__ / / tamu.edu _____/.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'_'_/ \__________\__ / / _____/_'_'_'_'_'_'_'_'_'_'_'_'_'_'_/ \_ / /__________/ \/____/\\\\\\ \\\\\\ ------
⌨️ 快捷键说明
复制代码
Ctrl + C
搜索代码
Ctrl + F
全屏模式
F11
切换主题
Ctrl + Shift + D
显示快捷键
?
增大字号
Ctrl + =
减小字号
Ctrl + -