178765

神经网络昆斯林的新闻组分类2006

Xref: cantaloupe.srv.cs.cmu.edu talk.politics.misc:178765 alt.sex:111613 soc.men:68661 misc.legal:60840
Path: cantaloupe.srv.cs.cmu.edu!crabapple.srv.cs.cmu.edu!bb3.andrew.cmu.edu!news.sei.cmu.edu!fs7.ece.cmu.edu!europa.eng.gtefsd.com!howland.reston.ans.net!noc.near.net!uunet!optilink!cramer
From: [e-mail] (Clayton Cramer)
Newsgroups: talk.politics.misc,ca.politics,ba.politics,alt.sex,soc.men,misc.legal
Subject: Re: New Study Out On Gay Percentage
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Date: 19 Apr 93 16:42:03 GMT
References: <[e-mail]> <[e-mail]>
Organization: Optilink Corporation, Petaluma, CA
Lines: 21

In article <[e-mail]>, [e-mail] (BLORT! eeeep! Hwaaah.) writes:
# 	Actually, I was rather surprised to see an article on this subject
# (i.e. the "new, inproved" survey saying that roughly 1% of men are gay)
# on the front page of The New York _Times_ recently (I think it was
# on Thurs, 15 April).  The headline was something to the effect of 
# "New Survey Finds 1% of Men Are Gay"
# 
# 	I was shocked, not because the New York _Times_ was running a story
# on a sex survey (although that was part of it), but because they thought
# that this news was actually important enough to warrant front page space.
# I mean, how many people actually CARE how many people are gay (as long as
# you know how to find/avoid them if you want to)?  I don't.  

If you don't care, why was so much effort put into promoting the
10% lie?  Because it was important to scare politicians into
obedience.

# 							-Matt
-- 
Clayton E. Cramer {uunet,pyramid}!optilink!cramer  My opinions, all mine!
Relations between people to be by mutual consent, or not at all.