176984

神经网络昆斯林的新闻组分类2006

Xref: cantaloupe.srv.cs.cmu.edu misc.headlines:41588 talk.politics.misc:176984 talk.politics.mideast:75413 alt.conspiracy:21400 alt.censorship:15356 alt.politics.media:325
Path: cantaloupe.srv.cs.cmu.edu!das-news.harvard.edu!ogicse!network.ucsd.edu!usc!aludra.usc.edu!not-for-mail
From: [e-mail] (Fogbound Child)
Newsgroups: misc.headlines,talk.politics.misc,talk.politics.mideast,alt.conspiracy,alt.censorship,alt.politics.media
Subject: Re: NEWS YOU MAY HAVE MISSED, Mar 29
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Date: 6 Apr 93 03:00:18 GMT
Article-I.D.: aludra.1pscv2INNcn3
References: <1p7b51$[e-mail]> <[e-mail]> <1pkl2n$[e-mail]> <[e-mail]> <1pqfmh$[e-mail]>
Sender: [e-mail]
Organization: University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
Lines: 58
NNTP-Posting-Host: aludra.usc.edu

[e-mail] (Jack Schmidling) writes:

>In article <[e-mail]> [e-mail] (Fogbound Child) writes:
>>
>>Jack, I happen to be Jewish and have some serious problems with the whole
>>situation in Israel. But your exaggerations and commentary certainly don't help
>>to support your viewpoint. Here, for example, you are conflating two separate
>>stories, and exaggerating both of them.

>If I have confused two different stories, it was an honest mistake but I do
>not see why it becomes an exageration of either.  They both took place and

Both events took place, but not as you described them. It feels trivial to
nit-pick about details like this, and insulting to everyone involved.
But I feel that the truth is more damning than an exaggeration, and
much more likely to cause people to think when they read it.

In general, when I read an argument that uses inaccurate and inflamatory
statements (honest mistake or not), I tend to dismiss the entire argument
because of those errors.

The entire situation in the Middle East is too important to reduce to
back-and-forth propaganda -- it is precisely this reduction that further
polarizes the situation and makes peace, understanding, and reconcilliation
impossible.

>are both equally disgusting behavior for any country, let alone one that
>brags constantly about democracy.

Agreed. It would have been better if both situations could have been avoided.

[I accidently deleted the line about how it would be better if more of
 YOU PEOPLE would do something about disgust and closets]

What's this YOU PEOPLE stuff anyway? How does it contribute to a
rational discussion of the issues?

>in the closet,  we wouldn't be having this discussion.

>Having said, you have my heartfelt thanks and admiration for even saying
>what you have said already.  I suspect, you will be getting more  hate
>mail than support.

Frankly, I've received no mail on the subject, hateful or supportive.

>Thanks,

>js

___Samuel___
Mossad Special Agent ID314159
Media Spiking and Mind Control Division
Los Angeles Offices
-- 
_________Pratice Safe .Signature! Prevent Dangerous Signature Virii!_______
Guildenstern: Our names shouted in a certain dawn ... a message ... a
              summons ... There must have been a moment, at the beginning,
              where we could have said -- no. But somehow we missed it.