📄 178522
字号:
Xref: cantaloupe.srv.cs.cmu.edu alt.rush-limbaugh:23556 alt.politics.clinton:29304 talk.politics.misc:178522Path: cantaloupe.srv.cs.cmu.edu!das-news.harvard.edu!noc.near.net!howland.reston.ans.net!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!moe.ksu.ksu.edu!kuhub.cc.ukans.edu!minerFrom: miner@kuhub.cc.ukans.eduNewsgroups: alt.rush-limbaugh,alt.politics.clinton,talk.politics.miscSubject: <None>Message-ID: <1993Apr15.172451.49206@kuhub.cc.ukans.edu>Date: 15 Apr 93 17:24:51 CSTReferences: <kmitchelC5BB6K.E70@netcom.com> <93101.090817MBS110@psuvm.psu.edu> <1993Apr11.152134.15459@afterlife.ncsc.mil> <13014@news.duke.edu> <1993Apr12.183349.23115@kadsma.kodak.com>Distribution: usaOrganization: University of Kansas Academic Computing ServicesLines: 22In article <1993Apr12.183349.23115@kadsma.kodak.com>, pajerek@telstar.kodak.com (Don Pajerek) writes:[...]> What I see is that the media is reasonably fair, but is seen as> 'liberal' by conservatives, and 'conservative' by liberals.Not that I think anyone cares, but this pattern (using other examplesof course) was discussed 2,000 years ago by Aristotle in_Nicomachean_Ethics_. Note that you can't use this insight to reasonbackwards; e.g.: Since the conservatives see the media as liberal andthe liberals see the media as conservative, the media are fair! (thoughI've seen this "reasoning" implied) > Don Pajerek> > Standard disclaimers apply.Ken-- miner@kuhub.cc.ukans.edu | Nobody can explain everything to everybody.opinions are my own | G. K. Chesterton
⌨️ 快捷键说明
复制代码
Ctrl + C
搜索代码
Ctrl + F
全屏模式
F11
切换主题
Ctrl + Shift + D
显示快捷键
?
增大字号
Ctrl + =
减小字号
Ctrl + -