178678

神经网络昆斯林的新闻组分类2006

Xref: cantaloupe.srv.cs.cmu.edu talk.politics.guns:54347 talk.politics.misc:178678 soc.culture.jewish:63129
Newsgroups: talk.politics.guns,talk.politics.misc,soc.culture.jewish
Path: cantaloupe.srv.cs.cmu.edu!das-news.harvard.edu!noc.near.net!howland.reston.ans.net!usc!sdd.hp.com!apollo.hp.com!netnews
From: [e-mail] (Peter Nelson)
Subject: Re: Who's next? Mormons and Jews?
Sender: [e-mail] (Usenet News)
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Date: Tue, 20 Apr 1993 13:26:07 GMT
References: <[e-mail]> <[e-mail]> <[e-mail]>
Nntp-Posting-Host: c.ch.apollo.hp.com
Organization: Hewlett-Packard Corporation, Chelmsford, MA
Lines: 23

In article <[e-mail]> [e-mail] (Robert J. Kolker) writes:
>Thank you for remembering Matzada.  Matzada was not an insane act. It was
>a sanctification of G_D's name and the most extreme denial of tyranny
>possible. To this day the officers of the Tzahal (Isreal Defense Force)
>take their oath at the fortress. Lo Tepol Shaynit Matzadah. Matzadah will
>not fall again!
>
>Conan the Libertarian

   This is hilarious.  Here we have a self-described libertarian 
   getting all sentimental over a religious and national entity
   not exactly known for respecting individualism.   In somewhat
   more detail it should be noted that the whole concept of a 
   religion, and especially a patriarchial one like Judaism 
   (or Islam, or Christianity) is obediance to rules and authority.
   Leviticus, Deuteronomy, etc are FULL of "thou shalt"s and "thou
   shalt not"s.   And of course Israel's concept of human rights, while
   no doubt better than places like Syria's or Iraqs, is hardly the 
   stuff to warm the cockles of a libertarian's heart.


---peter