176986

神经网络昆斯林的新闻组分类2006

Xref: cantaloupe.srv.cs.cmu.edu talk.politics.misc:176986 sci.econ:16236
Path: cantaloupe.srv.cs.cmu.edu!crabapple.srv.cs.cmu.edu!fs7.ece.cmu.edu!europa.eng.gtefsd.com!howland.reston.ans.net!noc.near.net!uunet!news.tek.com!tekig7!tekig5!ssoar
From: [e-mail] (Steven E Soar)
Newsgroups: talk.politics.misc,sci.econ
Subject: Re: Supply Side-revenue
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Date: 6 Apr 93 14:40:43 GMT
References: <[e-mail]> <[e-mail]>
Sender: [e-mail]
Followup-To: talk.politics.misc
Distribution: na
Lines: 22

In article <[e-mail]>, [e-mail] (Ed Ipser) writes:
> 
> The result is that Clinton now HOPES to reduce the deficit to a level 
> ABOVE where it was when Reagan left office.

Which, considering the amount Bush&congress added to it, would be a
not-inconsiderable achievement.

While we're on the subject, I also believe that the supply-side claim that
reducing taxes raised revenue is also false, because they typically factor in
SocSec taxes, which were *raised* a considerable amount, at the same time that
income taxes were cut.  If you look at income tax revenue alone, it fell after
after the cuts began, and didn't recover for several years. By then, record
deficits were well entrenched.
> 
> Chew on that awhile.

*crunch, crunch*

steve soar