178862

神经网络昆斯林的新闻组分类2006

Xref: cantaloupe.srv.cs.cmu.edu misc.legal:60887 soc.men:68687 talk.politics.misc:178862
Path: cantaloupe.srv.cs.cmu.edu!magnesium.club.cc.cmu.edu!news.sei.cmu.edu!cis.ohio-state.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!optilink!cramer
From: [e-mail] (Clayton Cramer)
Newsgroups: misc.legal,soc.men,talk.politics.misc
Subject: Re: New Study Out On Gay Percentage
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Date: 20 Apr 93 23:01:28 GMT
References: <[e-mail]> <[e-mail]> <[e-mail]>
Organization: Optilink Corporation, Petaluma, CA
Lines: 21

In article <[e-mail]>, [e-mail] (Russ Anderson) writes:
> In article <[e-mail]>, [e-mail] (BLORT! eeeep! Hwaaah.) writes:
# # 	Actually, I was rather surprised to see an article on this subject
# # (i.e. the "new, inproved" survey saying that roughly 1% of men are gay)
# # on the front page of The New York _Times_ recently (I think it was
# # on Thurs, 15 April).  The headline was something to the effect of 
# # "New Survey Finds 1% of Men Are Gay"
# 
# Does anyone else see the difference between "1% of Men Are Gay" and 1%
# of Men surveyed *say* they are gay?  Does the NY Times think that
# there is no one "in the closet"?

I see.  When survey after survey show 1-4%, we are supposed to believe
ONE survey, done with very poor assumptions, with a very atypical
population, 40 years ago when the society was FAR more repressed about
homosexuality than it is now.  Yeah, right.

# Russ Anderson    |  Disclaimer: Any statements are my own and do not reflect
-- 
Clayton E. Cramer {uunet,pyramid}!optilink!cramer  My opinions, all mine!
Relations between people to be by mutual consent, or not at all.