83797

神经网络昆斯林的新闻组分类2006

Xref: cantaloupe.srv.cs.cmu.edu talk.abortion:120790 alt.atheism:53392 talk.religion.misc:83797
Path: cantaloupe.srv.cs.cmu.edu!das-news.harvard.edu!noc.near.net!uunet!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!decwrl!sun-barr!news2me.EBay.Sun.COM!exodus.Eng.Sun.COM!hernes-sun!emarsh
From: [e-mail] (Eric Marsh)
Newsgroups: talk.abortion,alt.atheism,talk.religion.misc
Subject: Re: After 2000 years, can we say that Christian Morality is
Date: 16 Apr 1993 17:07:07 GMT
Organization: Sun
Lines: 22
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
References: <1qgouk$[e-mail]> <[e-mail]> <1qie61$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: hernes-sun

In article <1qie61$[e-mail]> [e-mail] (Frank O'Dwyer) writes:
>In article <[e-mail]> [e-mail] (Jim Halat) writes:
>#I'm one of those people who does not know what the word objective means 
>#when put next to the word morality.  I assume its an idiom and cannot
>#be defined by its separate terms.

>#Give it a try.

>Objective morality is morality built from objective values.

Well, that got us a long way. Now define "objective value," and
make sure that you are referring to _moral_ (not scientific) values.

While your at it, take a look at the definition of "objective" and
"values." If you don't have a dictionary, I've written those definitons
in a couple of recent postings.

>-- 
>Frank O'Dwyer                                  'I'm not hatching That'
>[e-mail]                                  from "Hens",  by Evelyn Conlon

eric