83518

神经网络昆斯林的新闻组分类2006

Xref: cantaloupe.srv.cs.cmu.edu alt.magick:9895 alt.pagan:29623 talk.religion.misc:83518
Path: cantaloupe.srv.cs.cmu.edu!magnesium.club.cc.cmu.edu!news.sei.cmu.edu!cis.ohio-state.edu!pacific.mps.ohio-state.edu!linac!uwm.edu!cs.utexas.edu!sdd.hp.com!spool.mu.edu!wupost!csus.edu!netcom.com!netcomsv!boo!tweekco!alizard
From: [e-mail] (A.Lizard)
Newsgroups: alt.magick,alt.pagan,talk.religion.misc
Subject: Re: Rosicrucian Order(s) ?!
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Date: Sun, 18 Apr 93 15:01:46 PDT
References: <[e-mail]>
Organization: Tweek-Com Systems BBS, Moraga, CA [phone]
Lines: 32

[e-mail] (Max Delysid (y!)) writes:

> In article <1qppef$[e-mail]> [e-mail] (Tony
> >
> >     Name just three *really* competing Rosicrucian Orders. I have
> >probably spent more time than you doing the same. 
> >
> >     None of them are spin-offs from O.T.O. The opposite may be the
> >case. 
> 
> Can we assume from this statement that you are >unequivocally< saying that
> AMORC is not a spin off of OTO? .. and that in fact, OTO may well be a spin
> off of AMORC??
> i would be quite interested in hearing what evidence you have to support this
> claim. 
> 
> 

Well, there is a fair amount of evidence floating around that indicates
that OTO has been around since at least the late 1800s, long before
Crowley ever heard of it, how long has AMORC been around? (yes, I know
that they claim to have existed as an organization clear into prehistory,
but I doubt that they have any organizational paperwork
as a non-profit that can be carbon-dated to 20,000 BC)
                                             A.Lizard

-------------------------------------------------------------------
A.Lizard Internet Addresses:
[e-mail]        (preferred)
PacBell.COM!boo!tweekco!alizard (bang path for above)
[e-mail] (backup)
PGP2.2 public key available on request