84355

神经网络昆斯林的新闻组分类2006

Xref: cantaloupe.srv.cs.cmu.edu talk.abortion:121540 alt.atheism:54161 talk.religion.misc:84355
Newsgroups: talk.abortion,alt.atheism,talk.religion.misc
Path: cantaloupe.srv.cs.cmu.edu!crabapple.srv.cs.cmu.edu!fs7.ece.cmu.edu!europa.eng.gtefsd.com!howland.reston.ans.net!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!saimiri.primate.wisc.edu!sdd.hp.com!decwrl!apple!mumbo.apple.com!lefty.apple.com!user
From: [e-mail] (Lefty)
Subject: Re: After 2000 years, can we say that Christian Morality is
Sender: [e-mail] (The News System)
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Date: Thu, 22 Apr 1993 19:18:46 GMT
References: <[e-mail]> <1qhn7m$[e-mail]> <[e-mail]> <1qtsmc$[e-mail]>
Organization: Our Lady of Heavy Artillery
Lines: 15

In article <1qtsmc$[e-mail]>, [e-mail] (Frank
O'Dwyer) wrote:
> 
> Well I can cut to the chase and admit that what I find least attractive 
> about realtivism is that it elevates the heinous to the level of the good, 
> by saying in effect "to each his own", or "what's good for you,  isn't good
> for me".  Thus the terrorist is elevated to the same level as the man
> of peace.

So, then, I assume that you feel that there is an objective definition for
"terrorist"?

--
Lefty ([e-mail])
C:.M:.C:., D:.O:.D:.