83732

神经网络昆斯林的新闻组分类2006

Newsgroups: talk.religion.misc
Path: cantaloupe.srv.cs.cmu.edu!magnesium.club.cc.cmu.edu!news.sei.cmu.edu!cis.ohio-state.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!agate!linus!linus.mitre.org!mwunix.mitre.org!m23364
From: [e-mail] (James Meritt)
Subject: See? ( was Re: Apology to Jim Meritt (Was: Silence is concurance)
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Sender: [e-mail] (News Service)
Nntp-Posting-Host: mwunix.mitre.org
Organization: MITRE Corporation, McLean VA
References: <[e-mail]> <[e-mail]> <[e-mail]>
Distribution: usa
Date: Tue, 20 Apr 1993 19:27:53 GMT
Lines: 45

In article <[e-mail]> [e-mail] (David Joslin) writes:
}[e-mail] (James Meritt) writes:
}>}So stop dodging the question.  What is hypocritical about my
}>}criticizing bad arguments, given that I do this both when I agree
}>}with the conclusion and when I disagree with the conclusion?  
}>
}>You are the one who has claimed to possess the fruits of precognition,
}>telepathy, and telempathy.  Divine it yourself.
}
}Another dodge.  Oh well.  I'm no match for your amazing repertoire
}of red herrings and smoke screens.  
}
}You asked for an apology.  I'm not going to apologize for pointing out
}that your straw-man argument was a straw-man argument.  Nor for saying
}that your list of "bible contradictions" shows such low standards of
}scholarship that it should be an embarrassment to anti-inerrantists,
}just as Josh McDowell should be an embarrassment to the fundies.  Nor
}for objecting various times to your taking quotes out of context.  Nor
}for pointing out that "they do it too" is not an excuse. Nor for calling
}your red herrings and smoke screens what they are.

How about the following inaccurate, unsubstantiated accusations:
In [e-mail]
>Jim has been threatening
	- but no "threat" produced 
>once he realized that
	- display of telepathy
>threatening to quote me
	- in spite of no "threat" produced, nor forecast ever happening (precognition?)
>responding Jim's threat to quote me
	- in spite of claimed threat never being given
>Jim, preparing to...
	- in spite of it never happening.  telepathy or precognition?
>Jim again, still mystified
	- unsubstantiated and untrue.  more telepathy?  Or maybe telempathy?
>Jim, still scandalized
	- unsubstantiated again.  Seems to be a habit...

Having more trouble with reality, it appears.  Why get bothered with the facts when
you appear to have the products of paranatural divination methods?


*yawn*