83983

神经网络昆斯林的新闻组分类2006

Xref: cantaloupe.srv.cs.cmu.edu talk.abortion:121008 talk.religion.misc:83983
Newsgroups: talk.abortion,talk.religion.misc
Path: cantaloupe.srv.cs.cmu.edu!magnesium.club.cc.cmu.edu!news.sei.cmu.edu!cis.ohio-state.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!moe.ksu.ksu.edu!ux1.cso.uiuc.edu!uchinews!quads!eeb1
From: [e-mail] (E. Elizabeth Bartley)
Subject: Re: What part of "No" don't you understand?
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Sender: [e-mail] (News System)
Reply-To: [e-mail]
Organization: University of Chicago
References: <[e-mail]> <[e-mail]> <[e-mail]>
Date: Sat, 24 Apr 1993 00:25:09 GMT
Lines: 30

In article <[e-mail]>
[e-mail] ( Steve Novak) writes:
>> = "David R. Sacco" writes:

>>Some
>>people even raised protests when we had a moment of silence for a class
>>member who had tragically died, saying this implied endorsing religion.

>Because, of course, that possibility existed.  Meaning any student who
>really gave a shit could have a moment of silence on his/her own, which
>makes more sense than forcing those who DON'T want to participate to
>have to take part.  What other reason is there for an organized "moment
>of silence"?

A "moment of silence" doesn't mean much unless *everyone*
participates.  Otherwise it's not silent, now is it?

Non-religious reasons for having a "moment of silence" for a dead
classmate: (1) to comfort the friends by showing respect to the
deceased , (2) to give the classmates a moment to grieve together, (3)
to give the friends a moment to remember their classmate *in the
context of the school*, (4) to deal with the fact that the classmate
is gone so that it's not disruptive later.

Blindly opposing everything with a flavor of religion in it is
utterly idiotic.

-- 
Pro-Choice                 Anti-Roe                     - E. Elizabeth Bartley
            Abortions should be safe, legal, early, and rare.