83535

神经网络昆斯林的新闻组分类2006

Xref: cantaloupe.srv.cs.cmu.edu alt.magick:9904 alt.pagan:29630 talk.religion.misc:83535
Path: cantaloupe.srv.cs.cmu.edu!das-news.harvard.edu!noc.near.net!howland.reston.ans.net!wupost!gumby!destroyer!cs.ubc.ca!uw-beaver!news.u.washington.edu!stein.u.washington.edu!mimir
From: [e-mail] (Grendel Grettisson)
Newsgroups: alt.magick,alt.pagan,talk.religion.misc
Subject: Re: Rosicrucian Order(s) ?!
Date: 19 Apr 1993 05:37:03 GMT
Organization: The Friends of Loki Society
Lines: 27
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail]> <[e-mail]> <1qsqar$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: stein.u.washington.edu

In article <1qsqar$[e-mail]> [e-mail] (Tony Alicea) writes:
>
>In a previous article, [e-mail] (B.A. Davis-Howe) says:
>
>>
>>ON the subject of how many competing RC orders there are, let me point out the
>>Golden Dawn is only the *outer* order of that tradition.  The inner order is
>>the Roseae Rubeae et Aurae Crucis.  
>>
>
>	Just wondering, do you mean the "Lectorium Rosicrucianum"?
>Warning: There is no point in arguing who's "legit" and who's not. *WHICH*
>Golden Dawn are you talking about?

 Which Golden Dawn? How about the original from 100 years ago?

>	Just for the sake of argument, (reflecting NO affiliation)
>I am going to say that the TRUE Rosicrucian Order is the Fraternitas
>Rosae Crucis in Quakertown, Penn.,
>
>	Any takers? :-)

 No. No Rosicrucian would ever admit or deny being such.

Wassail,
Grendel Grettisson