84251

神经网络昆斯林的新闻组分类2006

Path: cantaloupe.srv.cs.cmu.edu!magnesium.club.cc.cmu.edu!news.sei.cmu.edu!fs7.ece.cmu.edu!europa.eng.gtefsd.com!howland.reston.ans.net!wupost!decwrl!apple!apple!mumbo.apple.com!gallant.apple.com!sandvik-kent.apple.com!user
From: [e-mail] (Kent Sandvik)
Newsgroups: talk.religion.misc
Subject: Re: Is it good that Jesus died?
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Date: 26 Apr 93 00:13:14 GMT
References: <[e-mail]> <[e-mail]> <[e-mail]> <[e-mail]> <[e-mail]>
Sender: [e-mail]
Followup-To: talk.religion.misc
Organization: Cookamunga Tourist Bureau
Lines: 21

In article <[e-mail]>, [e-mail]
(Ken Arromdee) wrote:
> 
> In article <[e-mail]> [e-mail] (Brian Ceccarelli 602/621-9615) writes:
> >Even though a new-born is innocent as can be, his sinful nature
> >will surely manifest itself more explicity as he gets older.
> 
> Ah, so you admit newborns are innocent?  Then you cannot say _everyone_ is a
> sinner.
> 
> About the only way top get out of this one is to claim that a newborn is a
> sinner despite having not committed any sins, which is rather odd.

This all would also implicate that in order for the sinning 2 month
old baby to get forgivance, he or she has to ask for help from Jesus.
Somehow I find this a little bit amuzing.

Cheers,
Kent
---
[e-mail]. ALink: KSAND -- Private activities on the net.