84356

神经网络昆斯林的新闻组分类2006

Xref: cantaloupe.srv.cs.cmu.edu talk.abortion:121541 alt.atheism:54162 talk.religion.misc:84356
Newsgroups: talk.abortion,alt.atheism,talk.religion.misc
Path: cantaloupe.srv.cs.cmu.edu!crabapple.srv.cs.cmu.edu!bb3.andrew.cmu.edu!news.sei.cmu.edu!cis.ohio-state.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!sdd.hp.com!decwrl!apple!mumbo.apple.com!lefty.apple.com!user
From: [e-mail] (Lefty)
Subject: Re: After 2000 years, can we say that Christian Morality is
Sender: [e-mail] (The News System)
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Date: Thu, 22 Apr 1993 19:22:00 GMT
References: <[e-mail]> <1qjbn0$[e-mail]> <[e-mail]> <1qu0f6$[e-mail]>
Organization: Our Lady of Heavy Artillery
Lines: 28

In article <1qu0f6$[e-mail]>, [e-mail] (Frank
O'Dwyer) wrote:
> 
> In article <[e-mail]> [e-mail] (Jim Halat) writes:
> #In article <1qjbn0$[e-mail]>, [e-mail] (Frank O'Dwyer) writes:
> #
> #
> #>Really?  You don't know what objective value is?  If I offered the people
> #>of the U.S., collectively, $1 for all of the land in America, would that 
> #>sound like a good deal?  
> #
> #That happens to be a subjective example that the people of the
> #US would happen to agree on.  Continue to move the price up; 
> #at some point a few people would accept then more then more until 
> #probably all would accept at a high enough number.
> 
> And this "high enough number" is...?  :-)
> 
> My point is that the deal is bad, and pretty much anyone can see it is so.

Really?  I suspect my neighbor would jump at your deal.

Of course, she's only three, but if it were "objectively" bad, you wouldn't
think it would make a difference...

--
Lefty ([e-mail])
C:.M:.C:., D:.O:.D:.