83807

神经网络昆斯林的新闻组分类2006

Xref: cantaloupe.srv.cs.cmu.edu alt.magick:9956 alt.pagan:29739 talk.religion.misc:83807
Path: cantaloupe.srv.cs.cmu.edu!magnesium.club.cc.cmu.edu!news.sei.cmu.edu!cis.ohio-state.edu!pacific.mps.ohio-state.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!malgudi.oar.net!caen!batcomputer!reed!henson!news.u.washington.edu!cpac.washington.edu!joshua
From: [e-mail] (Joshua Geller)
Newsgroups: alt.magick,alt.pagan,talk.religion.misc
Subject: Re: Merlin, Mithras and Magick
Followup-To: alt.magick,alt.pagan,talk.religion.misc
Date: 21 Apr 93 03:09:24 GMT
Organization: Institute for the Study of Ancient Science
Lines: 30
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail]> <[e-mail]>
	<[e-mail]>
	<[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: bailey.cpac.washington.edu
In-reply-to: [e-mail]'s message of 20 Apr 1993 18:43:14 GMT


In article <[e-mail]> 
[e-mail] (Pegasus) writes:

>   In article <[e-mail]>,
>   [e-mail] (Joshua Geller) wrote:

>   > In article <[e-mail]> 
>   > [e-mail] (LaurieEWBrandt) writes:

>   LEWB>> Lets add to those percentages 13-15% for the Orphaic docterians
>   brought LEWB>>to the group by Paul/Saul who was a high ranking initiate. On
>   the LEWB>>development of Orphaic Mysteries, see Jane Harrisons .Prolegomena
>   to the LEWB>>study of Greek religion. Cambridge U Press 1922. and you can
>   easly draw LEWB>>your own conclusions.

>   josh> perhaps you can quote just a bit of her argument?

>   Love to,but I must do it a bit later My copy of Harrison in packed, but the
>   last chapter as best as I can rember deals with Orphic mysteries and their
>   views of women though she does not come out and say it it is strongly
>   implyed that the Christian view was drawn heavly from the Orphic and other
>   Major cults of the time.

I would really appreciate if when someone brought something like
this up they didn't back out when someone asked for details.

have a day,
josh