83898

神经网络昆斯林的新闻组分类2006

Xref: cantaloupe.srv.cs.cmu.edu alt.atheism:53530 talk.religion.misc:83898 talk.origins:40992
Newsgroups: alt.atheism,talk.religion.misc,talk.origins
Path: cantaloupe.srv.cs.cmu.edu!das-news.harvard.edu!noc.near.net!howland.reston.ans.net!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!darwin.sura.net!sgiblab!nec-gw!netkeeper!vivaldi!aslws01!aslss02!duffy
From: [e-mail] (Joseph Duffy)
Subject: Re: After 2000 years, can we say that Christian Morality is 
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Sender: [e-mail]
Nntp-Posting-Host: aslss02-sub1
Organization: NEC America, Inc Irving TX
References: <[e-mail]> <[e-mail]> <[e-mail]>
Date: Fri, 16 Apr 1993 19:37:23 GMT
Lines: 11

In article <[e-mail]> [e-mail] (Seth J. Bradley) writes:
>
>How does one falsify God's existance?  This, again, is a belief, not a scien-
>tific premise.  The original thread referred specifically to "scientific
>creationism".  This means whatever theory or theories you propose must be
>able to be judged by the scientific method.  This is in contrast to
>purely philosophical arguments.
>-- 

How does one falsify any origin theory? For example, are a forever existing
universe or abiogenesis strictly falsifiable?