10107

神经网络昆斯林的新闻组分类2006

Xref: cantaloupe.srv.cs.cmu.edu comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware:61987 comp.os.ms-windows.misc:10107
Path: cantaloupe.srv.cs.cmu.edu!das-news.harvard.edu!noc.near.net!howland.reston.ans.net!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!oracle!unrepliable!bounce
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware,comp.os.ms-windows.misc
From: [e-mail] (Eric Bosco)
Subject: Where to put my swap file (IDE or SCSI)
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Sender: [e-mail] (Oracle News Poster)
Nntp-Posting-Host: monica.us.oracle.com
Reply-To: [e-mail]
Organization: Oracle Corp., Redwood Shores CA
Date: Wed, 28 Apr 1993 16:02:20 GMT
X-Disclaimer: This message was written by an unauthenticated user
              at Oracle Corporation.  The opinions expressed are those
              of the user and not necessarily those of Oracle.
Lines: 24


I have a 486 sx 25 and I recently added a SCSI drive to my system using an  
Adaptec 1522 (non busmastering) controller. Yesterday I ran coretest to  
find out drive performance and these are the values I got

Seagate 106 Meg: 875.1kb/Sec	14.5ms avg seek   3.7ms track to track 
Quantum 400 Meg SCSI: 991.2 Kb/sec  12.7 avg seek 3.6 track to track.

First off all are these good results? I don't know what typical values  
are.

What I'm wondering now is the following. My swap file is currently on the  
IDE. I could move it to the SCSI which is 13% faster, but then I would not  
be able to use 32-bit access which might actuall make it slower. So on  
which drive should I put my swap file to get best results? Is there a swap  
file speed test program out there?

Finally, I also ran the above tests with the ASPI2DOS driver loaded and I  
got no difference whatsoever in performance. Is there any reason at all  
why I should load this driver?

Thanks in advance, I will post a summary if I get enough responses.

-Eric