9499

神经网络昆斯林的新闻组分类2006

Xref: cantaloupe.srv.cs.cmu.edu comp.os.ms-windows.misc:9499 comp.graphics:38341
Newsgroups: comp.os.ms-windows.misc,comp.graphics
Path: cantaloupe.srv.cs.cmu.edu!crabapple.srv.cs.cmu.edu!fs7.ece.cmu.edu!europa.eng.gtefsd.com!emory!swrinde!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!cs.utexas.edu!utnut!torn!blaze.trentu.ca!trentu.ca!ayounes
From: [e-mail] (Amro Younes, Trent University, C.C. #314, Peterborough, ON, Canada K9J 7B8. [phone])
Subject: Re: So what is the fastest Windows video card for graphics and imaging ?
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41    
Keywords: Windows, graphics, imaging
Sender: [e-mail] (USENET News System)
Organization: Trent Computing and Telecommunications Department
References: <[e-mail]>
Date: Fri, 16 Apr 1993 14:10:00 GMT
Lines: 35

In article <[e-mail]>, [e-mail] writes...
>We have heard many bad things about the ATI Ultra Plus card (mainly having
>to do with its buggy Windows drivers).
> 
>I would like to replace by ATI Graphics Ultra with a true-colour accelerated
>card. I was about to buy the ATI Ultra Plus (EISA) but it has had so much
>bad press that I am reconsidering.

I have the ATI GRAPHICS ULTRA PRO EISA version.  I must admit it has 
received bad press but that was due to the faulty drivers it had.  Now the 
drivers that are available for the EISA version are the same ones as the ISA 
and Local Bus (v1.5 Build 59).  Some people complained about problems they 
had with the Build 59 drivers, fortunately I couldn't duplicate them on my 
machine, but I did have one problem with Harvard Graphics that nobody else 
seemed to have.

> 
>I would like an accelerated card
>             a card that does 24bit true colour at 800x600 at least
>             a card that does 1024x758 at 256 colours (or more)
>             a card that has fast polygon fills
>             a card that has fast bit blits
>             a card that has a robust windows driver
>             a card that has high speed non-interlaced refresh
> 
>Any suggestions?
> 

I wouldn't recommed the ATI for 24bit colour at 800x600, at this resolution 
the display will be interlaced.  But at 16bit it isn't, I thought it was my 
monitor but it isn't, its the card (that is the only time you will get 
interlaced).  If I come up with cards more suited for your needs I'll let 
you know.

Amro