📄 10167
字号:
Xref: cantaloupe.srv.cs.cmu.edu comp.unix.misc:8269 comp.os.ms-windows.misc:10167 comp.os.os2.advocacy:18369Newsgroups: comp.unix.misc,comp.os.ms-windows.misc,comp.os.os2.advocacyPath: cantaloupe.srv.cs.cmu.edu!das-news.harvard.edu!noc.near.net!uunet!leviticus!daily!mfraioliFrom: mfraioli@grebyn.com (Marc Fraioli)Subject: Re: (Some info) The DOS/MSW meltdown is progressing nicelyMessage-ID: <1993May1.195102.6095@grebyn.com>Organization: Grebyn TimesharingReferences: <1rqn1f$n3k@almaak.usc.edu> <messinaC6B7zL.IHo@netcom.com>Date: Sat, 1 May 1993 19:51:02 GMTLines: 32In article <messinaC6B7zL.IHo@netcom.com> messina@netcom.com (Tony Porczyk) writes:>ajayshah@almaak.usc.edu (Ajay Shah) writes:>>>"The Preferred Applications Development Platform">>according to 432 of the Fortune 1000 corporations>>Survey by Sentry Market Research Survey>> 1992 1993>>Unix 18 28>>Mainframe 35 22>>DOS & MSW 24 18>>Development of what? In-house apps? Maybe, but certainly not apps>to be sold on an open market. Statistics like that are laughable,>because they may simply mean that there are not enough shrink-wrapped>usable apps for UNIX and they have to be developed disproportionately>often as compared to the installed UNIX base.>>t.>Actually, you might be surprised to find that not everyone who developsmainstream DOS and Windows apps develops them under DOS or Windows. PCWeek recently printed a rumor that Microsoft's Excel development groupdoes its development under OS/2. Another trade rag did an articlerecently about a group doing Windows development on Sun SPARCstationswith SoftPC to test out their work. SCO Unix is and has been areasonably popular development platform for DOS, Windows, and even OS/2apps. DOS and Windows are simply not robust or stable enough fordevelopment work, IMHO, and apparently others agree.-- Marc Fraiolimfraioli@grebyn.com (So I'm a minimalist...)
⌨️ 快捷键说明
复制代码
Ctrl + C
搜索代码
Ctrl + F
全屏模式
F11
切换主题
Ctrl + Shift + D
显示快捷键
?
增大字号
Ctrl + =
减小字号
Ctrl + -