59271

神经网络昆斯林的新闻组分类2006

Xref: cantaloupe.srv.cs.cmu.edu misc.consumers:68035 sci.med:59271 rec.food.cooking:65745 sci.environment:29725
Path: cantaloupe.srv.cs.cmu.edu!magnesium.club.cc.cmu.edu!news.sei.cmu.edu!cis.ohio-state.edu!pacific.mps.ohio-state.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!usc!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!nntp-server.caltech.edu!SOL1.GPS.CALTECH.EDU!CARL
From: [e-mail] (Carl J Lydick)
Newsgroups: misc.consumers,sci.med,rec.food.cooking,sci.environment
Subject: Re: Is MSG sensitivity superstition?
Date: 25 Apr 1993 18:27:34 GMT
Organization: HST Wide Field/Planetary Camera
Lines: 29
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail]> <[e-mail]> <[e-mail]> <[e-mail]>,<[e-mail]>
Reply-To: [e-mail]
NNTP-Posting-Host: sol1.gps.caltech.edu

In article <[e-mail]>, [e-mail] (Mary E. Allison) writes:
=Which was why I started checking EVERY time I got sick.  And EVERY
=time I got sick MSG was somehow involved in one of the food products.

Which points up the "studies" made by amateurs:  Did you ALSO check EVERY TIME
YOU DID *NOT* get sick?  "No," you say?  Why not check every thing you eat when
you don't get sick and find out how much MSG you're actually consuming?

=> All that's needed now is that final step, a double-blind study done
=> on humans.  There isn't even an ethical question about "possible
=> harm", as this is a widely used and approved food additive.
=
=But - some say that only 2% of the population has a problem with MSG -
=some say it's more like 20% - but let's say that it's 5%.  How many
=people would have to be tested that would have a problem?  Also - I
=KNOW I have a problem with it, and I wouldn't VOLUNTEER for a test.

If you knew enough about what the test was about to decide that you didn't want
to participate because it involved MSG, you'd've already made yourself
ineligible (since MSG IS detectable by taste). How can anybody be so clueless
as to what double blind studies are all about?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Carl J Lydick | INTERnet: [e-mail] | NSI/HEPnet: SOL1::CARL

Disclaimer:  Hey, I understand VAXen and VMS.  That's what I get paid for.  My
understanding of astronomy is purely at the amateur level (or below).  So
unless what I'm saying is directly related to VAX/VMS, don't hold me or my
organization responsible for it.  If it IS related to VAX/VMS, you can try to
hold me responsible for it, but my organization had nothing to do with it.