⭐ 欢迎来到虫虫下载站! | 📦 资源下载 📁 资源专辑 ℹ️ 关于我们
⭐ 虫虫下载站

📄 61546

📁 神经网络昆斯林的新闻组分类2006
💻
字号:
Newsgroups: sci.spacePath: cantaloupe.srv.cs.cmu.edu!rochester!udel!gatech!howland.reston.ans.net!noc.near.net!uunet!mcsun!news.funet.fi!aton.abo.fi!usenetFrom: MLINDROOS@FINABO.ABO.FI (Marcus Lindroos INF)Subject: Re: Mothership for Flybys and cutting costs..In-Reply-To: nsmca@aurora.alaska.edu's message of Sat, 1 May 1993 13:13:12 GMTMessage-ID: <1993May2.122756.2049@abo.fi>Sender: usenet@abo.fi (Usenet NEWS)Organization: Abo Akademi University, FinlandReferences:  <1993May1.051312.1@aurora.alaska.edu>Date: Sun, 2 May 1993 12:27:56 GMTX-News-Reader: VMS NEWS 1.24Lines: 52In <1993May1.051312.1@aurora.alaska.edu> nsmca@aurora.alaska.edu writes:> Getting wierd again?> > Okay what about launching one probe with multiple parts.. Kind of liek the old> MIRV principle of old Cold War Days. > Basically what I mean is design a mother ship that has piggy backed probes for> different missions,namely different planets. Each probe would be tied in with> the mother ship (or earth as the case may be).. This is good when and if we go> for Mars (the MArs mission can act as either Mother ship or relay point for the> probes.I can't see the need for a single (big? expensive? heavy?) "mothership" exceptfor Voyager style flyby missions. A few years ago, I did some calculations on a"Grand Tour" space probe launched by a Saturn V in 1975-76. At the time,I felt thatthe idea of a big "mother ship" had some merit - the Voyagers had to be rathersmall, lightweight craft due to the limitations imposed by using weak TitanIII/Centaur launchers. The concept I examined (and Michael's?) had a lot incommon with the British Interplanetary Society's Daedalus project for sending aprobe to Barnard's Star - i.e. a large "bus" spacecraft carrying severalsmaller probes to be dispatched when the ship arrives at its destination.The Saturn V supposedly would have been able to launch a 10-ton payload towardsJupiter and beyond. The "bus" could have included far more powerfulcameras/telescopes/scientific equipment and a heavier/more powerful powersource than the Voyagers as there would be no limitations on weight anymore.Extremely important as the Voyagers had to perform most of their measurementswithin a couple of weeks before and after planetary encounter, and usually at arelatively great distance.---The smaller probes carried aboard might have been based on the "real" Voyagers,and an even smaller version like the one scheduled for launch towards Pluto inthe early 21st century, and would have been released at various points duringthe mission. The advantages are obvious: the bus would have carried out thesame basic Jupiter-Saturn-Uranus-Neptune mission than Voyager 2 did, but inaddition two "sub-probes" could have been relased at Saturn, examiningthat planet's south polar regions before moving on to Pluto. This would haveenabled NASA to map both hemispheres of Pluto/Charon by 1986...and severalother probes could have examined parts of the Jupiter/Saturn/Uranus/Neptunesystems that weren't examined in great detail by the Voyagers due totrajectory-related factors. A small "swarm" of camera-equipped miniature spaceprobes released a month before encounter would have been too costly for a small Voyager-type mission but entirely feasible if launched from a heavy, well-equipped spacecraft. And would we have learned a lot more about the outerplanets! The reason why the Grand Tour was cancelled was lack of money, ofcourse. MARCU$   > ==> Michael Adams, nsmca@acad3.alaska.edu -- I'm not high, just jacked> 

⌨️ 快捷键说明

复制代码 Ctrl + C
搜索代码 Ctrl + F
全屏模式 F11
切换主题 Ctrl + Shift + D
显示快捷键 ?
增大字号 Ctrl + =
减小字号 Ctrl + -