104752

神经网络昆斯林的新闻组分类2006

Newsgroups: rec.motorcycles
Path: cantaloupe.srv.cs.cmu.edu!das-news.harvard.edu!noc.near.net!howland.reston.ans.net!usc!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!news.claremont.edu!ucivax!megatek!randy
From: [e-mail] (Randy Davis)
Subject: Re: Shaft-drives and Wheelies
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Sender: [e-mail] (Randy Davis)
Reply-To: [e-mail]
Organization: Megatek Corporation, San Diego, California
References: <[e-mail]> <[e-mail]>
Date: Fri, 23 Apr 1993 16:49:01 GMT
Lines: 19

In article <[e-mail]> [e-mail] writes:
|Course, the only people who seem to be acting smug now probably have chain
|final drive (which, as we all know, is less efficient and has higher
|maintenance) and probably didn't know the answer at the start of the thread.

  When did *you* go out and change the laws of physics? :-)  According to some
numbers I used to see bandied around, shaft drive is on the order of 95-97%
efficient, while chain drive is closer to 99%...   Seems to me that this makes
*chain* drive more efficient, hmmmmm???

  And granted, shaft has a lot less maintenance, which is fine, if you don't
mind less performance... :-) :-)

Randy Davis                            Email: [e-mail]
ZX-11 #00072 Pilot                            {uunet!ucsd}!megatek!randy
DoD #0013

       "But, this one goes to *eleven*..." - Nigel Tufnel, _Spinal Tap_