103117

神经网络昆斯林的新闻组分类2006

Path: cantaloupe.srv.cs.cmu.edu!das-news.harvard.edu!noc.near.net!howland.reston.ans.net!usenet.ins.cwru.edu!po.CWRU.Edu!aas7
From: [e-mail] (Andrew A. Spencer)
Newsgroups: rec.autos
Subject: Re: Too fast
Date: 16 Apr 1993 20:20:47 GMT
Organization: Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH (USA)
Lines: 25
Message-ID: <1qn4ev$[e-mail]>
References: <1qh61m$[e-mail]> <[e-mail]> <1qkon8$[e-mail]> <[e-mail]>
Reply-To: [e-mail] (Andrew A. Spencer)
NNTP-Posting-Host: slc5.ins.cwru.edu


In a previous article, [e-mail] (wharfie) says:

>In article <1qkon8$[e-mail]> [e-mail] (Jim Frost) writes:
>>larger engine.  That's what the SHO is -- a slightly modified family
>>sedan with a powerful engine.  They didn't even bother improving the
>>*brakes.*
>
>	That shows how much you know about anything.  The brakes on the
>SHO are very different - 9 inch (or 9.5? I forget) discs all around,
>vented in front.  The normal Taurus setup is (smaller) discs front, 
>drums rear.

one i saw had vented rears too...it was on a lot.
of course, the sales man was a fool..."titanium wheels"..yeah, right..
then later told me they were "magnesium"..more believable, but still
crap, since Al is so m uch cheaper, and just as good....


i tend to agree, tho that this still doesn't take the SHO up to "standard"
for running 130 on a regular basis.  The brakes should be bigger, like
11" or so...take a look at the  ones on the Corrados.(where they have
braking regulations).

DREW