103434

神经网络昆斯林的新闻组分类2006

Newsgroups: rec.autos
Path: cantaloupe.srv.cs.cmu.edu!magnesium.club.cc.cmu.edu!news.sei.cmu.edu!cis.ohio-state.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!news!news.world.net!guardian.up.edu!sequent!muncher.sequent.com!battan
From: [e-mail] (Jim Battan)
Subject: Re: 300ZX or SC300???
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Sender: [e-mail] (usenet )
Nntp-Posting-Host: cruncher.sequent.com
Organization: Sequent Computer Systems Inc.
References: <[e-mail]>
Date: Sun, 25 Apr 93 19:54:33 GMT
Lines: 17

In article <[e-mail]> [e-mail] (Danny Phornprapha) writes:
>I'm getting a car in the near future.  I've narrow it down to 300ZX and SC300.
>Which might be a better choice?

Having driven both, and having owned an SC300 for 14 months now, all I can
say is "it depends".  They're both great cars.  In fact, my wife and I
are saving our pennies so we can get her the 300ZX convertible in a year.
The 300ZX handles like a dream, while the SC300 rides like a dream.
Fit and finish on both are excellent, but the Lexus gets the nod in
customer satisfaction.  They're both very attractive, and hideously
expensive.  The resale value of the SC is better than the ZX.  The
300ZX isn't available with traction control, which makes it a handful
on slippery surfaces.
-- 
Jim Battan - Sequent Computer Systems, Beaverton, OR
[e-mail] or uunet!sequent!battan
[phone]