103333

神经网络昆斯林的新闻组分类2006

Path: cantaloupe.srv.cs.cmu.edu!magnesium.club.cc.cmu.edu!news.sei.cmu.edu!cis.ohio-state.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!malgudi.oar.net!news.ans.net!europa.eng.gtefsd.com!howland.reston.ans.net!wupost!uunet!enterpoop.mit.edu!senator-bedfellow.mit.edu!athena.mit.edu!tgardner
From: [e-mail] (Timothy J Gardner)
Newsgroups: rec.autos
Subject: Re: The 1994 Mustang
Date: 24 Apr 1993 23:59:25 GMT
Organization: Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Lines: 47
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail]> <[e-mail] <[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: pesto.mit.edu

In article <[e-mail]> [e-mail] (Brian J Queiser) writes:

On the subject of the upcoming new Mustang:

>I do not put much stock in the mag rags' "inside" information, or even
>Ford rep quotes.  The Taurus was pretty much a surprise when it was
>finally disclosed in it's entirety.  "Inside" information had the
>Taurus with a V8 and rear-wheel drive at one point.  I wouldn't look
>for a simple re-paneled Mustang, folks; you may be cheating yourself
>if you do.  There's a lot of potential.  Ford hasn't released a new
>car without a 4-wheel IS in 7 years.  The Mustang project has been
>brewing for at least 4, right?  A 4-wheel IS could happen.  Those
>modular V8's are out there, too.  In the interest of CAFE and
>competition, don't rule those out, either.   Your ignorant if you do.
>And there are so many spy shots and artist renderings out there,
>who really knows what it'll look like?  The Mach III?  Doubt it.
>Highly.
>
>The next Mustang will be Ford's highest profile car.  It attracts
>way more attention than the Camaro/Firebird because it's heritage
>is more embedded in the general public.  Don't lie to yourself and
>believe Ford will forfeit that.


The car magazines have printed a lot of information about the new Mustang
and the consensus about what to believe in my "car circle" is that the 
suspension pieces and tuning will be almost identical to the current
Cobra, but on a stiffer body structure which will improve its behavior.
After the MN12 (Thunderbird) cost and weight debacle, Ford decided 
independent rear suspension with rear wheel drive won't be tried again in 
a volume car.  

The current 4.9l V-8 will soldier on for about two years.  A version of
the 32 valve modular V-8 in the Mark VIII could be offered then.  Ford
is spending big money tooling up for 2.5l and 3.5l V-6 engines which will
power most of their cars in the immediate future, and therefore probably
do not consider volume production of 300 hp V-8 engines a priority. 

Undisguised, the car looks OK, but not nearly as exciting as the new
Camaro/Firebird, IMO.  

I suspect Ford will produce their car with higher quality than GM will 
achieve with the Camaro/ Firebird.  The way GM loses money, the temptation
to "just get them out the door" for the sake of positive cash flow will be 
great once demand really takes off.  

Tim Gardner