54591

神经网络昆斯林的新闻组分类2006

Xref: cantaloupe.srv.cs.cmu.edu talk.politics.guns:54591 soc.culture.usa:13833 alt.rush-limbaugh:23730
Newsgroups: talk.politics.guns,soc.culture.usa,alt.rush-limbaugh
Path: cantaloupe.srv.cs.cmu.edu!das-news.harvard.edu!noc.near.net!howland.reston.ans.net!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!uwm.edu!ux1.cso.uiuc.edu!news.cso.uiuc.edu!uxh.cso.uiuc.edu!irvine
From: [e-mail] (Brent Irvine)
Subject: Re: ATF BURNS DIVIDIAN RANCH! NO SURVIVORS!!!
Date: Fri, 23 Apr 1993 16:38:39 GMT
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail]> <[e-mail]> <dusek.735489223@shale>
Sender: [e-mail] (Net Noise owner)
Organization: University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Lines: 26

In article <dusek.735489223@shale> [e-mail] (James P. Dusek) writes:
>[e-mail] (Alan Greig) writes:
>>or the cultists...) I think I'll quote the BBC quoting (actually voice
>>interview) one of the two British survivors. He claimed that the fire
>>started when the tanks caused an internal wooden wall/roof to collapse
>>knocking over kerosene lamps and that they had no suicide plan.
>
>	If the FBI started the fire, why didn`t people flee the
>burning building?

In this case, it was unimportant as to who set the fire.  The Davidians
would have burned no matter what, ESPECIALLY if the BATF/FBI set the
fire as this would make the beseiged martyrs to Vernon Howell and
therefore rocket to heaven.  A few comments from the remaining
Davidians scattered throughout the country seemed to confirm this
theory (One cult member said that she wished that she had been there,
and that now she would have to wait for Vernon to Return for them.  She
actually seemed upset that she did not burn with them).

While I think that Vernon started the fire (his followers anyway), 
it is incidental to their reaction.

-- 
<><><><><><><><><><> Personal opinions? Why,  <><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>
<>  BRENT IRVINE  <> yes.  What did you think <> [e-mail]  <>
<><><><><><><><><><> they were?.......        <><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>