55239

神经网络昆斯林的新闻组分类2006

Newsgroups: talk.politics.guns
Path: cantaloupe.srv.cs.cmu.edu!magnesium.club.cc.cmu.edu!news.sei.cmu.edu!cis.ohio-state.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!uwm.edu!caen!nigel.msen.com!yale.edu!news.yale.edu!yar.trincoll.edu!mcec-149.dynamic.trincoll.edu!user
From:  ()
Subject: Re: CLINTON JOINS LIST OF GENOCIDAL SOCIALIST LEADERS
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Followup-To: talk.politics.guns
Sender: [e-mail] (SACM Usenet News)
Organization: Trinity College, Hartford, CT.
References: <1r5rnn$[e-mail]> <[e-mail]> <1ra0i5$[e-mail]>
Date: Mon, 26 Apr 1993 17:33:23 GMT
Lines: 25

In article <1ra0i5$[e-mail]>, [e-mail] (C. D.
Tavares) wrote:
>
> > Perhaps you've been under a rock since, say, the turn of the century. How
> > in the #$^& is one man supposed to review every single freaking
> > governmental action, every day? That's why we have an executive branch. HE
> > reviewed the plan and said "go," but he wasn't the architect and he wasn't
> > there, bullhorn in hand, implementing it. Yes, he was responsible in the
> > sense that he was briefed. So what! Shit happens. 
> 
> Hey, joe -- assuming you're old enough to remember it -- how did you feel
> about presidential responsibility every time Reagan said "I don't recall" 
> about his arms-for-hostages meetings with the Ollie North gang?
> 
> How did you feel about it when Bush said he "was out of the loop on that
> decision" when he was right there in the thick of it?
> 
> Oh, right.  "He was responsible in the sense that he was briefed, but so
> what -- shit happens!"  Is that what you said?

Of course not. There's more than a little difference between formulating
foreign policy and overseeing the ATF's handling of a scenario involving a
group of religious fanatics. Why do people compare apples and oranges?

[e-mail]