54402

神经网络昆斯林的新闻组分类2006

Xref: cantaloupe.srv.cs.cmu.edu alt.politics.usa.constitution:2020 talk.politics.guns:54402
Newsgroups: alt.politics.usa.constitution,talk.politics.guns
Path: cantaloupe.srv.cs.cmu.edu!magnesium.club.cc.cmu.edu!news.sei.cmu.edu!cis.ohio-state.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!agate!doc.ic.ac.uk!warwick!pipex!sunic!psinntp!psinntp!dg-rtp!leonardo!meyers
From: [e-mail] (Bill Meyers)
Subject: Re: Some more about gun control...
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Sender: [e-mail] (Bill Meyers)
Date: Tue, 20 Apr 93 17:44:45 GMT
References: <[e-mail]> <1qhpcn$[e-mail]> <[e-mail]>
Organization: N/I
Lines: 16

In article <[e-mail]> [e-mail] (Stephen Graham) writes:
[ ... ]
>It's worth noting that US vs. Miller sustained Miller's conviction
>of possession of an illegal firearm, noting that a sawed-off shotgun
>was not a proper militia weapon. Therefore, US vs. Miller supports
>limited government regulation of firearms.

Then it also supports basing such regulations on ignorance.

Miller had disappeared, and nobody bothered to present _his_
side to the Supreme Court -- in particular, that sawed-off
shotguns were used in the World War I trenches, and in other
tight spots ever since guns had been invented.  Would _you_
turn one down if you had to "clean" an alley in E. St. Louis?
--------
Vegetarians kill, too