📄 rfc2495.txt
字号:
Network Working Group D. Fowler, EditorRequest for Comments: 2495 Newbridge NetworksObsoletes: 1406 January 1999Category: Standards Track Definitions of Managed Objects for the DS1, E1, DS2 and E2 Interface TypesStatus of this Memo This document specifies an Internet standards track protocol for the Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the "Internet Official Protocol Standards" (STD 1) for the standardization state and status of this protocol. Distribution of this memo is unlimited.Copyright Notice Copyright (C) The Internet Society (1999). All Rights Reserved.Abstract This memo defines a portion of the Management Information Base (MIB) for use with network management protocols in the Internet community. In particular, it describes objects used for managing DS1, E1, DS2 and E2 interfaces. This document is a companion document with Definitions of Managed Objects for the DS0 (RFC 2494 [30]), DS3/E3 (RFC 2496 [28]), and the work in progress, SONET/SDH Interface Types. This memo specifies a MIB module in a manner that is both compliant to the SNMPv2 SMI, and semantically identical to the peer SNMPv1 definitions.Table of Contents 1 The SNMP Management Framework ................................ 2 1.1 Changes from RFC1406 ....................................... 3 2 Overview ..................................................... 4 2.1 Use of ifTable for DS1 Layer ............................... 5 2.2 Usage Guidelines ........................................... 6 2.2.1 Usage of ifStackTable for Routers and DSUs ............... 6 2.2.2 Usage of ifStackTable for DS1/E1 on DS2/E2 ............... 8 2.2.3 Usage of Channelization for DS3, DS1, DS0 ................ 9 2.2.4 Usage of Channelization for DS3, DS2, DS1 ................ 9 2.2.5 Usage of Loopbacks ....................................... 10 2.3 Objectives of this MIB Module .............................. 11 2.4 DS1 Terminology ............................................ 11Fowler, Ed. Standards Track [Page 1]RFC 2495 DS1/E1/DS2/E2 MIB January 1999 2.4.1 Error Events ............................................. 12 2.4.2 Performance Defects ...................................... 12 2.4.3 Performance Parameters ................................... 14 2.4.4 Failure States ........................................... 17 2.4.5 Other Terms .............................................. 21 3 Object Definitions ........................................... 21 3.1 The DS1 Near End Group ..................................... 22 3.1.1 The DS1 Configuration Table .............................. 22 3.1.2 The DS1 Current Table .................................... 33 3.1.3 The DS1 Interval Table ................................... 36 3.1.4 The DS1 Total Table ...................................... 39 3.1.5 The DS1 Channel Table .................................... 42 3.2 The DS1 Far End Group ...................................... 43 3.2.1 The DS1 Far End Current Table ............................ 43 3.2.2 The DS1 Far End Interval Table ........................... 47 3.2.3 The DS1 Far End Total Table .............................. 50 3.3 The DS1 Fractional Table ................................... 53 3.4 The DS1 Trap Group ......................................... 55 3.5 Conformance Groups ......................................... 61 4 Appendix A - Use of dsx1IfIndex and dsx1LineIndex ............ 66 5 Appendix B - The delay approach to Unavialable Seconds. ..... 69 6 Intellectual Property ........................................ 70 7 Acknowledgments .............................................. 70 8 References ................................................... 71 9 Security Considerations ...................................... 73 10 Author's Address ............................................ 74 11 Full Copyright Statement .................................... 751. The SNMP Management Framework The SNMP Management Framework presently consists of five major components: o An overall architecture, described in RFC 2271 [1]. o Mechanisms for describing and naming objects and events for the purpose of management. The first version of this Structure of Management Information (SMI) is called SMIv1 and described in STD 16, RFC 1155 [2], STD 16, RFC 1212 [3] and RFC 1215 [4]. The second version, called SMIv2, is described in RFC 1902 [5], RFC 1903 [6] and RFC 1904 [7]. o Message protocols for transferring management information. The first version of the SNMP message protocol is called SNMPv1 and described in STD 15, RFC 1157 [8]. A second version of the SNMP message protocol, which is not an Internet standards track protocol, is called SNMPv2c and described in RFC 1901 [9] and RFC 1906 [10]. The third version of the message protocol isFowler, Ed. Standards Track [Page 2]RFC 2495 DS1/E1/DS2/E2 MIB January 1999 called SNMPv3 and described in RFC 1906 [10], RFC 2272 [11] and RFC 2274 [12]. o Protocol operations for accessing management information. The first set of protocol operations and associated PDU formats is described in STD 15, RFC 1157 [8]. A second set of protocol operations and associated PDU formats is described in RFC 1905 [13]. o A set of fundamental applications described in RFC 2273 [14] and the view-based access control mechanism described in RFC 2275 [15]. Managed objects are accessed via a virtual information store, termed the Management Information Base or MIB. Objects in the MIB are defined using the mechanisms defined in the SMI. This memo specifies a MIB module that is compliant to the SMIv2. A MIB conforming to the SMIv1 can be produced through the appropriate translations. The resulting translated MIB must be semantically equivalent, except where objects or events are omitted because no translation is possible (use of Counter64). Some machine readable information in SMIv2 will be converted into textual descriptions in SMIv1 during the translation process. However, this loss of machine readable information is not considered to change the semantics of the MIB.1.1. Changes from RFC1406 The changes from RFC1406 are the following: (1) The Fractional Table has been deprecated. (2) This document uses SMIv2. (3) Usage is given for ifTable and ifXTable. (4) Example usage of ifStackTable is included. (5) dsx1IfIndex has been deprecated. (6) Support for DS2 and E2 have been added. (7) Additional lineTypes for DS2, E2, and unframed E1 were added. (8) The definition of valid intervals has been clarified for the case where the agent proxied for other devices. In particular, the treatment of missing intervals has been clarified.Fowler, Ed. Standards Track [Page 3]RFC 2495 DS1/E1/DS2/E2 MIB January 1999 (9) An inward loopback has been added. (10) Additional lineStatus bits have been added for Near End in Unavailable Signal State, Carrier Equipment Out of Service, DS2 Payload AIS, and DS2 Performance Threshold. (11) A read-write line Length object has been added. (12) Signal mode of other has been added. (13) Added a lineStatus last change, trap and enabler. (14) The e1(19) ifType has been obsoleted so this MIB does not list it as a supported ifType. (15) Textual Conventions for statistics objects have been used. (16) A new object, dsx1LoopbackStatus has been introduced to reflect the loopbacks established on a DS1 interface and the source to the requests. dsx1LoopbackConfig continues to be the desired loopback state while dsx1LoopbackStatus reflects the actual state. (17) A dual loopback has been added to allow the setting of an inward loopback and a line loopback at the same time. (18) An object indicating which channel to use within a parent object (i.e. DS3) has been added. (19) An object has been added to indicate whether or not this DS1/E1 is channelized. (20) Line coding type of B6ZS has been added for DS22. Overview These objects are used when the particular media being used to realize an interface is a DS1/E1/DS2/E2 interface. At present, this applies to these values of the ifType variable in the Internet- standard MIB: ds1 (18) The definitions contained herein are based on the AT&T T-1 Superframe (a.k.a., D4) and Extended Superframe (ESF) formats [17, 18], the latter of which conforms to ANSI specifications [19], and the CCITT Recommendations [20, 21], referred to as E1 for the rest of this memo.Fowler, Ed. Standards Track [Page 4]RFC 2495 DS1/E1/DS2/E2 MIB January 1999 The various DS1 and E1 line disciplines are similar enough that separate MIBs are unwarranted, although there are some differences. For example, Loss of Frame is defined more rigorously in the ESF specification than in the D4 specification, but it is defined in both. Therefore, interface types e1(19) and g703at2mb(67) have been obsoleted. Where it is necessary to distinguish between the flavors of E1 with and without CRC, E1-CRC denotes the "with CRC" form (G.704 Table 4b) and E1-noCRC denotes the "without CRC" form (G.704 Table 4a).2.1. Use of ifTable for DS1 Layer Only the ifGeneralGroup needs to be supported. ifTable Object Use for DS1 Layer====================================================================== ifIndex Interface index. ifDescr See interfaces MIB [16] ifType ds1(18) ifSpeed Speed of line rate DS1 - 1544000 E1 - 2048000 DS2 - 6312000 E2 - 8448000 ifPhysAddress The value of the Circuit Identifier. If no Circuit Identifier has been assigned this object should have an octet string with zero length. ifAdminStatus See interfaces MIB [16] ifOperStatus See interfaces MIB [16] ifLastChange See interfaces MIB [16] ifName See interfaces MIB [16]. ifLinkUpDownTrapEnable Set to enabled(1). ifHighSpeed Speed of line in Mega-bits per second (2, 6, or 8) ifConnectorPresent Set to true(1) normally, except forFowler, Ed. Standards Track [Page 5]RFC 2495 DS1/E1/DS2/E2 MIB January 1999 cases such as DS1/E1 over AAL1/ATM where false(2) is appropriate2.2. Usage Guidelines2.2.1. Usage of ifStackTable for Routers and DSUs The object dsx1IfIndex has been deprecated. This object previously allowed a very special proxy situation to exist for Routers and CSUs. This section now describes how to use ifStackTable to represent this relationship. The paragraphs discussing dsx1IfIndex and dsx1LineIndex have been preserved in Appendix A for informational purposes. The ifStackTable is used in the proxy case to represent the association between pairs of interfaces, e.g. this T1 is attached to that T1. This use is consistent with the use of the ifStackTable to show the association between various sub-layers of an interface. In both cases entire PDUs are exchanged between the interface pairs - in the case of a T1, entire T1 frames are exchanged; in the case of PPP and HDLC, entire HDLC frames are exchanged. This usage is not meant to suggest the use of the ifStackTable to represent Time Division Multiplexing (TDM) connections in general. External&Internal interface scenario: the SNMP Agent resides on a host external from the device supporting DS1 interfaces (e.g., a router). The Agent represents both the host and the DS1 device. Example: A shelf full of CSUs connected to a Router. An SNMP Agent residing on the router proxies for itself and the CSU. The router has also an Ethernet interface:
⌨️ 快捷键说明
复制代码
Ctrl + C
搜索代码
Ctrl + F
全屏模式
F11
切换主题
Ctrl + Shift + D
显示快捷键
?
增大字号
Ctrl + =
减小字号
Ctrl + -