📄 rfc172.txt
字号:
NWG/RFC 172 The following data type codes are currently assigned. Where a byte size is not implicit in data type, it may be provided by the second byte. Hex Octal 00 000 1 Bit stream (standard default) 01 001 none Binary data bytes 02 002 8 Network ASCII characters 03 003 8 EBCDIC characters 04 004 36 DEC-packed ASCII (five 7-bit characters, 36th bit 1 or 0) 05 005 8 Decimal numbers, net. ASCII 06 006 8 Octal numbers, net. ASCII 07 007 8 Hexadecimal numbers, net. ASCII 08 010 through through Reserved for standard assignment 4F 077 5A 100 through through Reserved for experimental use FF 3773B.2 Requests and Identifiers Retrieve, delete, name_from, rename_t, and append requests contain a pathname, following the op code, in the information field. A pathname may also follow the opcode in list_file_directory request. A pathname must uniquely identify a file in the serving host. The syntax of pathnames and identifying information shall conform to serving host conventions, except that standard network ASCII (as defined in the TELNET protocol) shall be used. [Page 7]NWG/RFC 172 The store request has a 4-byte (32 bits) 'allocate size' field followed by pathname. 'Allocate size' indicates the number of bits of storage to be allocated to the file. A size of zero indicates that server should use his default. Retrieve request achieves the transfer of a copy of file specified in pathname, from serving to using host. The status and contents of file in serving host should be unaffected. Store request achieves the transfer of a copy of file specified in pathname, from using to serving host. If file specified in pathname exists on serving hosts, then its contents shall be replaced by the contents of the file being transferred. A new file is created at the serving host, if the file specified in pathname does not exist. Append request achieves the transfer of data from using to serving host. The transferred data is appended to file specified in pathname, at serving host. Rename-from and rename-to requests cause the name of the file specified in pathname of rename_from to be changed to the name specified in pathname of rename_to. A rename_from must always be followed by a rename_to request. Delete request causes file specified in pathname to be deleted from the serving host. If an extra level of protection is desired such as the query "Do you really wish to delete this file?", it is to be a local implementation in the using system. Such queries should not be transmitted over network connections. Username and password identifiers contain the respective identifying information. Normally, the information will be supplied by the user of the file transfer service. These identifiers are normally sent at the start of connection.3B.3 Error and Acknowledge Terminates The error transactions may have an error code indicated by the second descriptor byte. Transmission of an error message in text is also permitted. The following error codes are defined. [Page 8]NWG/RFC 172 Error Code (2nd descriptor byte) Meaning Hex Octal 00 000 Error condition indicated by computer system (external to protocol) 01 001 Name syntax error 02 003 Access control violation 03 003 Abort 04 004 Allocate size too big 05 005 Allocate size overflow 06 006 Improper order for transactions 07 007 Opcode not implemented 08 010 File search failed 09 011 Error described in text message (ASCII characters follow code)At present, no completion codes are defined for acknowledge. It isassumed that acknowledge refers to the current request beingfulfilled.4. Order of Transactions4A. A certain order of transactions must be maintained in fulfilling file transfer requests. The exact sequence in which transactions occur depends on the type of request, as described in section 4B. The fulfilling of a request may be aborted anytime by either host, as explained in section 4C.4B. Identifier transactions (change data type, username, and password) may be sent by user at any time. The usual order would be a username transaction followed by a password transaction at the start of the connection. No acknowledge is required, or permitted. The identifiers are to be used for default handling, and access control. [Page 9]NWG/RFC 172 Retrieve and list_file_directory requests cause the transfer of file from server to user. After a complete file has been transferred, the server should indicate end-of-file (by sending CLS or file separator) to complete the request fulfillment sequence, as shown below. Read / List_file_directory request -------------------------------------> User <File -- data> Server <------------------------------------- End of file indication <------------------------------------- Store and append requests cause the transfer of file from user to server. After a complete file has been transferred, the user should send an end-of-file indication. The receipt of the file must be acknowledged by the server, as shown below. User Store / Append request Server -------------------------------------> <File -- data> -------------------------------------> End of file indication -------------------------------------> Acknowledge <------------------------------------- Rename_from request must be followed by a rename_to request. The request must be acknowledged as shown below. User Rename_from request Server -------------------------------------> Rename_to request -------------------------------------> Acknowledge <------------------------------------- The delete request requires the server to acknowledge it, as shown below. User Delete Server -------------------------------------> Acknowledge <------------------------------------- Error transactions may be sent by either host at any time, and these terminate the current request fulfillment sequence. [Page 10]NWG/RFC 1724C. Aborts. Either host may abort a request fulfillment sequence at any time by sending an error terminate, or by closing the connection (NCP to transmit a CLS for the connection). CLS is a more drastic type of abort and shall be used when there is a catastrophic failure, or when abort is desired in the middle of a long transaction. The abort indicates to the receiving host that sender of abort wishes to terminate request fulfillment and is now ready to initiate or fulfill new requests. When CLS is used to abort, the using host will be responsible for reopening connection. The file transfer abort described here is different from the data transfer abort which is sent only by the sender of data. The use of the data transfer abort is not defined in this protocol.6. Initial Connection, CLS, and Access Control6A. There will be a preassigned permanent socket number[6] for the cooperating file transfer process at the serving host. The connection establishment will be in accordance with the standard initial connection protocol[7], establishing a full-duplex connection.6B. The connection will be broken by trading a CLS between the NCP's for each of the two connections. Normally, the user will initiate CLS. CLS may also be used by either user or server, to abort a transaction in the middle. If CLS is received in the middle of transaction, the current request fulfillment sequence will be aborted. The using host will then reopen connection.6C. It is recommended that identifier (user name and password) transactions be sent by user to server , at the start, as this would facilitate default handling and access control for the entire duration of connection. The identifier transactions do not require or permit and acknowledge, and the user can proceed directly with requests. If the identifier information is incorrect or not received, the server may send an error transaction indicating access control, violation, upon subsequent requests.NOTES[1] Alex McKenzie, BBN, is conducting a survey of network file systemsto determine the practicality of standard pathname conventions, and todisseminate information to network users on host file systems. [Page 11]NWG/RFC 172[2] This initial subset represents control functions necessary for basicfile transfer operations, and some elementary file manipulationoperations. There is no attempt to provide a data management or completefile management capability.[3] It is possible that we may, at a later date, assign meaning to theseinformation separators within FTP.[4] A workable subset is any request, plus terminates. Identifiers maybe required in addition when using protected file systems.[5] It is, however, possible that this bit stream is treated like ASCIIcharacters in specific instances such as transmitting a file to a lineprinter.[6] It seems that socket 1 has been assigned to logger. Socket 3 seems areasonable choice for File Transfer.[7] RFC 165, or any subsequent standard applicable in initial connectionto loggers. [ This RFC was put into machine readable form for entry ] [ into the online RFC archives by Glenn Forbes Fleming Larratt 5/97 ] [Page 12]
⌨️ 快捷键说明
复制代码
Ctrl + C
搜索代码
Ctrl + F
全屏模式
F11
切换主题
Ctrl + Shift + D
显示快捷键
?
增大字号
Ctrl + =
减小字号
Ctrl + -