📄 rfc1286.txt
字号:
Network Working Group E. DeckerRequest for Comments: 1286 cisco Systems, Inc. P. Langille Digital Equipment Corporation A. Rijsinghani Digital Equipment Corporation K. McCloghrie Hughes LAN Systems, Inc. December 1991 Definitions of Managed Objects for BridgesStatus of this Memo This memo is an extension to the SNMP MIB. This RFC specifies an IAB standards track protocol for the Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the "IAB Official Protocol Standards" for the standardization state and status of this protocol. Distribution of this memo is unlimited.Table of Contents 1. Abstract ............................................. 2 2. The Network Management Framework...................... 2 3. Objects .............................................. 2 3.1 Format of Definitions ............................... 3 4. Overview ............................................. 3 4.1 Structure of MIB .................................... 4 4.1.1 The dot1dBase Group ............................... 7 4.1.2 The dot1dStp Group ................................ 7 4.1.3 The dot1dSr Group ................................. 7 4.1.4 The dot1dTp Group ................................. 7 4.1.5 The dot1dStatic Group ............................. 7 4.2 Relationship to Other MIBs .......................... 7 4.2.1 Relationship to the 'system' group ................ 8 4.2.2 Relationship to the 'interfaces' group ............ 8 4.3 Textual Conventions ................................. 9 5. Definitions .......................................... 9 5.1 Groups in the Bridge MIB ............................ 11 5.2 The dot1dBase Group Definitions ..................... 11 5.3 The dot1dStp Group Definitions ...................... 14 5.4 The dot1dSr Group Definitions ....................... 22 5.5 The dot1dTp Group Definitions ....................... 28 5.6 The dot1dStatic Group Definitions ................... 34 5.8 Traps for use by Bridges ............................ 36 6. Acknowledgments ...................................... 37Decker, Langille, Rijsinghani & McCloghrie [Page 1]RFC 1286 Bridge MIB December 1991 7. References ........................................... 38 8. Security Considerations............................... 39 9. Authors' Addresses.................................... 401. Abstract This memo defines a portion of the Management Information Base (MIB) for use with network management protocols in TCP/IP based internets. In particular it defines objects for managing bridges based on the IEEE 802.1d draft standard between Local Area Network (LAN) segments. Provisions are made for support of transparent and source route bridging. Provisions are also made so that these objects apply to bridges connected by subnetworks other than LAN segments.2. The Network Management Framework The Internet-standard Network Management Framework consists of three components. They are: RFC 1155 which defines the SMI, the mechanisms used for describing and naming objects for the purpose of management. RFC 1212 defines a more concise description mechanism, which is wholly consistent with the SMI. RFC 1156 which defines MIB-I, the core set of managed objects for the Internet suite of protocols. RFC 1213, defines MIB-II, an evolution of MIB-I based on implementation experience and new operational requirements. RFC 1157 which defines the SNMP, the protocol used for network access to managed objects. The Framework permits new objects to be defined for the purpose of experimentation and evaluation.3. Objects Managed objects are accessed via a virtual information store, termed the Management Information Base or MIB. Objects in the MIB are defined using the subset of Abstract Syntax Notation One (ASN.1) [7] defined in the SMI. In particular, each object has a name, a syntax, and an encoding. The name is an object identifier, an administratively assigned name, which specifies an object type. The object type together with an object instance serves to uniquely identify a specific instantiation of the object. For human convenience, we often use a textual string, termed the OBJECT DESCRIPTOR, to also refer to the object type.Decker, Langille, Rijsinghani & McCloghrie [Page 2]RFC 1286 Bridge MIB December 1991 The syntax of an object type defines the abstract data structure corresponding to that object type. The ASN.1 language is used for this purpose. However, the SMI [3] purposely restricts the ASN.1 constructs which may be used. These restrictions are explicitly made for simplicity. The encoding of an object type is simply how that object type is represented using the object type's syntax. Implicitly tied to the notion of an object type's syntax and encoding is how the object type is represented when being transmitted on the network. The SMI specifies the use of the basic encoding rules of ASN.1 [8], subject to the additional requirements imposed by the SNMP.3.1. Format of Definitions Section 5 contains the specification of all object types contained in this MIB module. The object types are defined using the conventions defined in the SMI, as amended by the extensions specified in [9,10].4. Overview A common device present in many networks is the Bridge. This device is used to connect Local Area Network segments below the network layer. There are two major modes defined for this bridging; transparent and source route. The transparent method of bridging is defined in the draft IEEE 802.1d specification [11]. Source route bridging has been defined by I.B.M. and is described in the Token Ring Architecture Reference [12]. IEEE 802.1d is currently working on combining the source route and transparent techniques in a compatible fashion. This memo defines those objects needed for the management of a bridging entity operating in one of these modes. To be consistent with IAB directives and good engineering practice, an explicit attempt was made to keep this MIB as simple as possible. This was accomplished by applying the following criteria to objects proposed for inclusion: (1) Start with a small set of essential objects and add only as further objects are needed. (2) Require objects be essential for either fault or configuration management. (3) Consider evidence of current use and/or utility. (4) Limit the total of objects.Decker, Langille, Rijsinghani & McCloghrie [Page 3]RFC 1286 Bridge MIB December 1991 (5) Exclude objects which are simply derivable from others in this or other MIBs. (6) Avoid causing critical sections to be heavily instrumented. The guideline that was followed is one counter per critical section per layer.4.1. Structure of MIB Objects in this MIB are arranged into groups. Each group is organized as a set of related objects. The overall structure and assignment of objects to their groups is shown below. Where appropriate the corresponding IEEE 802.1d [11] management object name is also included.Bridge MIB Name IEEE 802.1d Namedot1dBridge dot1dBase BridgeAddress Bridge.BridgeAddress NumPorts Bridge.NumberOfPorts Type PortTable Port BridgePort.PortNumber IfIndex Circuit DelayExceededDiscards .DiscardTransitDelay MtuExceededDiscards .DiscardOnError dot1dStp ProtocolSpecification Priority SpanningTreeProtocol .BridgePriority TimeSinceTopologyChange .TimeSinceTopologyChange TopChanges .TopologyChangeCount DesignatedRoot .DesignatedRoot RootCost .RootCost RootPort .RootPort MaxAge .MaxAge HelloTime .HelloTime HoldTime .HoldTime ForwardDelay .ForwardDelay BridgeMaxAge .BridgeMaxAge BridgeHelloTime .BridgeHelloTime BridgeForwardDelay .BridgeForwardDelay PortTable Port SpanningTreeProtocolPort .PortNumber Priority .PortPriorityDecker, Langille, Rijsinghani & McCloghrie [Page 4]RFC 1286 Bridge MIB December 1991 State .SpanningTreeState Enable PathCost .PortPathCost DesignatedRoot .DesignatedRoot DesignatedCost .DesignatedCost DesignatedBridge .DesignatedBridge DesignatedPort .DesignatedPort ForwardTransitions dot1dSr PortTable Port HopCount SourceRoutingPort .PortHopCount LocalSegment .SegmentNumber BridgeNum .BridgeNumber TargetSegment LargestFrame .LargestFrameSize STESpanMode .LimitedBroadcastMode SpecInFrames BridgePort .ValidSRFramesReceived SpecOutFrames .ValidSRForwardedOutbound ApeInFrames ApeOutFrames .BroadcastFramesForwarded SteInFrames SteOutFrames .BroadcastFramesForwarded SegmentMismatchDiscards .DiscardInvalidRI DuplicateSegmentDiscards .LanIdMismatch HopCountExceededDiscards .FramesDiscardedHopCountExceeded dot1dTp LearnedEntryDiscards BridgeFilter.DatabaseSize .NumDynamic,NumStatic AgingTime BridgeFilter.AgingTime FdbTable Address Status Port PortTable Port MaxInfo InFrames BridgePort.FramesReceived OutFrames .ForwardOutbound InDiscards .DiscardInbound dot1dStatic StaticTable Address ReceivePort AllowedToGoToDecker, Langille, Rijsinghani & McCloghrie [Page 5]RFC 1286 Bridge MIB December 1991 Status The following IEEE 802.1d management objects have not been included in the Bridge MIB for the indicated reasons.IEEE 802.1d Object DispositionBridge.BridgeName Same as sysDescr (MIB II)Bridge.BridgeUpTime Same as sysUpTime (MIB II)Bridge.PortAddresses Same as ifPhysAddress (MIB II)BridgePort.PortName Same as ifDescr (MIB II)BridgePort.PortType Same as ifType (MIB II)BridgePort.RoutingType Derivable from the implemented groupsSpanningTreeProtocol .BridgeIdentifier Combination of dot1dStpPriority and dot1dBaseBridgeAddress .TopologyChange Since this is transitory, it is not considered useful.SpanningTreeProtocolPort .Uptime Same as ifLastChange (MIB II) .PortIdentifier Combination of dot1dStpPortNum and dot1dStpPortPriority .TopologyChangeAcknowledged Since this is transitory, it is not considered useful. .DiscardLackOfBuffers RedundantTransmission Priority These objects are not required as per the Pics Proforma and not considered useful. .TransmissionPriorityName .OutboundUserPriority .OutboundAccessPrioritySourceRoutingPort The Source Routing Supplement, at the time of this writing, is not stable. The following objects were NOT included in this MIB because they are redundant or not considered useful. .LimitedBroadcastEnableBridgePort.DupLanIdOrTreeError .DiscardLackOfBuffers .DiscardErrorDetails .DiscardTargetLANInoperableDecker, Langille, Rijsinghani & McCloghrie [Page 6]RFC 1286 Bridge MIB December 1991 .ValidSRDiscardedInbound .BroadcastBytesForwarded .NonBroadcastBytesForwarded .FramesNotReceivedDueToCongestion .FramesDiscardedDueToInternalError4.1.1. The dot1dBase Group This mandatory group contains the objects which are applicable to all types of bridges.4.1.2. The dot1dStp Group This group contains the objects that denote the bridge's state with respect to the Spanning Tree Protocol. If a node does not implemented the Spanning Tree Protocol, this group will not be implemented. This group is applicable to any transparent only, source route, or SRT bridge which implements the Spanning Tree Protocol.4.1.3. The dot1dSr Group This group contains the objects that describe the entity's state with respect to source route bridging. If source routing is not supported
⌨️ 快捷键说明
复制代码
Ctrl + C
搜索代码
Ctrl + F
全屏模式
F11
切换主题
Ctrl + Shift + D
显示快捷键
?
增大字号
Ctrl + =
减小字号
Ctrl + -