rfc2940.txt
来自「著名的RFC文档,其中有一些文档是已经翻译成中文的的.」· 文本 代码 · 共 1,516 行 · 第 1/4 页
TXT
1,516 行
management of the COPS client." MODULE MANDATORY-GROUPS { copsDeviceStatusGroup, copsDeviceConfigGroup } OBJECT copsClientServerConfigTcpPort MIN-ACCESS read-only DESCRIPTION "Write access is required only if the device supports the configuration of COPS server information." OBJECT copsClientServerConfigPriority MIN-ACCESS read-only DESCRIPTION "Write access is required only if the device supports the configuration of COPS server information." OBJECT copsClientServerConfigRowStatus MIN-ACCESS read-only DESCRIPTION "Write access is required only if the device supports the configuration of COPS server information." OBJECT copsClientServerConfigRetryAlgrm MIN-ACCESS read-only DESCRIPTION "Write access is required only if the device supports the configuration of COPS server information." OBJECT copsClientServerConfigRetryCount MIN-ACCESS read-only DESCRIPTION "Write access is required only if the device supports the configuration of COPS server information."Smith Standards Track [Page 21]RFC 2940 COPS Client MIB October 2000 OBJECT copsClientServerConfigRetryIntvl MIN-ACCESS read-only DESCRIPTION "Write access is required only if the device supports the configuration of COPS server information." ::= { copsClientCompliances 1 }END5. Acknowledgments This document describes instrumentation for the client side of the COPS protocol which was defined by the RSVP Admission Policy (rap) Working Group, now known as the Resource Allocation Protocol (rap) Working Group.6. Security Considerations There are a number of management objects defined in this MIB that have a MAX-ACCESS clause of read-create. Such objects may be considered sensitive or vulnerable in some network environments. The support for SET operations in a non-secure environment without proper protection can have a negative effect on network operations. SNMPv1 by itself is not a secure environment. Even if the network itself is secure (for example by using IPSec), even then, there is no control as to who on the secure network is allowed to access and GET/SET (read/change/create/delete) the objects in this MIB. It is recommended that the implementers consider the security features as provided by the SNMPv3 framework. Specifically, the use of the User-based Security Model [USM] and the View-based Access Control Model [VACM] is recommended. It is then a customer/user responsibility to ensure that the SNMP entity giving access to an instance of this MIB, is properly configured to give access to the objects only to those principals (users) that have legitimate rights to indeed GET or SET (change/create/delete) them.Smith Standards Track [Page 22]RFC 2940 COPS Client MIB October 20007. References [ARCH] Harrington, D., Presuhn, R. and B. Wijnen, "An Architecture for Describing SNMP Management Frameworks", RFC 2571, April 1999. [V1PROTO] Case, J., Fedor, M., Schoffstall, M. and J. Davin, "Simple Network Management Protocol", STD 15, RFC 1157, May 1990. [V1SMI] Rose, M. and K. McCloghrie, "Structure and Identification of Management Information for TCP/IP- based Internets", STD 16, RFC 1155, May 1990. [V1CONCISE] Rose, M. and K. McCloghrie, "Concise MIB Definitions", STD 16, RFC 1212, March 1991. [V1TRAPS] Rose, M., "A Convention for Defining Traps for use with the SNMP", RFC 1215, March 1991. [V2SMI] McCloghrie, K., Perkins, D., Schoenwaelder, J., Case, J., Rose, M. and S. Waldbusser, "Structure of Management Information Version 2 (SMIv2)", STD 58, RFC 2578, April 1999. [V2TC] McCloghrie, K., Perkins, D., Schoenwaelder, J., Case, J., Rose, M. and S. Waldbusser, "Textual Conventions for SMIv2", STD 58, RFC 2579, April 1999. [V2CONFORM] McCloghrie, K., Perkins, D., Schoenwaelder, J., Case, J., Rose, M. and S. Waldbusser, "Conformance Statements for SMIv2", STD 58, RFC 2580, April 1999. [V2COMMUNITY] Case, J., McCloghrie, K., Rose, M. and S. Waldbusser, "Introduction to Community-based SNMPv2", RFC 1901, January 1996. [V2TRANS] Case, J., McCloghrie, K., Rose, M. and S. Waldbusser, "Transport Mappings for Version 2 of the Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMPv2)", RFC 1906, January 1996. [V2PROTO] Case, J., McCloghrie, K., Rose, M. and S. Waldbusser, "Protocol Operations for Version 2 of the Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMPv2)", RFC 1905, January 1996.Smith Standards Track [Page 23]RFC 2940 COPS Client MIB October 2000 [V3INTRO] Case, J., Mundy, R., Partain, D. and B. Stewart, "Introduction to Version 3 of the Internet-standard Network Management Framework", RFC 2570, April 1999. [V3MPC] Case, J., Harrington D., Presuhn R. and B. Wijnen, "Message Processing and Dispatching for the Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP)", RFC 2572, April 1999. [V3USM] Blumenthal, U. and B. Wijnen, "The User-Based Security Model (USM) for Version 3 of the Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMPv3)", RFC 2574, April 1999. [V3APPS] Levi, D., Meyer, P. and B. Stewart, "SNMP Applications", RFC 2573, April 1999. [V3VACM] Wijnen, B., Presuhn, R. and K. McCloghrie, "View-based Access Control Model for the Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP)", RFC 2575, April 1999. [MIB2] McCloghrie K. and M. Rose, "Management Information Base for Network Management of TCP/IP-based internets", STD 17, RFC 1213, March 1991. [FRAMEWORK] Yavatkar, R., Pendarakis, D. and Guerin, R., "A Framework for Policy-based Admission Control", RFC 2753, January 2000. [COPS] Boyle, J., Cohen, R., Durham, D., Herzog, S., Rajan, R. and A. Sastry, "The COPS (Common Open Policy Service) Protocol", RFC 2748, January 2000. [RSVP] Braden, R. ed., Zhang, L., Berson, S., Herzog, S. and S. Jamin, "Resource ReSerVation Protocol (RSVP) Version 1 - Functional Specification", RFC 2205, September 1997. [COPSRSVP] Boyle, J., Cohen, R., Durham, D., Herzog, S., Rajan, R. and A. Sastry, "COPS Usage for RSVP", RFC 2749, January 2000. [SRVLOC] Guttman, E., Perkins, C., Veizades, J. and M. Day, "Service Location Protocol, Version 2", RFC 2608, June 1999. [ADDRESSMIB] Daniele, M., Haberman, B., Routhier, S. and J. Schoenwaelder, "Textual Conventions for Internet Network Addresses", RFC 2851, June 2000.Smith Standards Track [Page 24]RFC 2940 COPS Client MIB October 2000 [PROCESS] Bradner, S., "The Internet Standards Process -- Revision 3", BCP 9, RFC 2026, October 1996.8. Authors' Addresses Andrew Smith Fax: +1 415 345 1827 Email: ah_smith@pacbell.net David Partain Ericsson Radio Systems Research and Innovation P.O. Box 1248 SE-581 12 Linkoping Sweden Phone: +46 13 28 41 44 EMail: David.Partain@ericsson.com John Seligson Nortel Networks, Inc. 4401 Great America Parkway Santa Clara, CA 95054 USA Phone: +1 408 495 2992 EMail: jseligso@nortelnetworks.comSmith Standards Track [Page 25]RFC 2940 COPS Client MIB October 20009. Notices The IETF takes no position regarding the validity or scope of any intellectual property or other rights that might be claimed to pertain to the implementation or use of the technology described in this document or the extent to which any license under such rights might or might not be available; neither does it represent that it has made any effort to identify any such rights. Information on the IETF's procedures with respect to rights in standards-track and standards-related documentation can be found in BCP-11. Copies of claims of rights made available for publication and any assurances of licenses to be made available, or the result of an attempt made to obtain a general license or permission for the use of such proprietary rights by implementors or users of this specification can be obtained from the IETF Secretariat. The IETF invites any interested party to bring to its attention any copyrights, patents or patent applications, or other proprietary rights which may cover technology that may be required to practice this standard. Please address the information to the IETF Executive Director.Smith Standards Track [Page 26]RFC 2940 COPS Client MIB October 200010. Full Copyright Statement Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2000). All Rights Reserved. This document and translations of it may be copied and furnished to others, and derivative works that comment on or otherwise explain it or assist in its implementation may be prepared, copied, published and distributed, in whole or in part, without restriction of any kind, provided that the above copyright notice and this paragraph are included on all such copies and derivative works. However, this document itself may not be modified in any way, such as by removing the copyright notice or references to the Internet Society or other Internet organizations, except as needed for the purpose of developing Internet standards in which case the procedures for copyrights defined in the Internet Standards process must be followed, or as required to translate it into languages other than English. The limited permissions granted above are perpetual and will not be revoked by the Internet Society or its successors or assigns. This document and the information contained herein is provided on an "AS IS" basis and THE INTERNET SOCIETY AND THE INTERNET ENGINEERING TASK FORCE DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE INFORMATION HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.Acknowledgement Funding for the RFC Editor function is currently provided by the Internet Society.Smith Standards Track [Page 27]
⌨️ 快捷键说明
复制代码Ctrl + C
搜索代码Ctrl + F
全屏模式F11
增大字号Ctrl + =
减小字号Ctrl + -
显示快捷键?