rfc1017.txt

来自「著名的RFC文档,其中有一些文档是已经翻译成中文的的.」· 文本 代码 · 共 1,067 行 · 第 1/4 页

TXT
1,067
字号
         Increased processor counts and increased usage of portable         units, mobile units and lap-top micros will make dynamic         management of the name/address space a must.  Units must have         fixed designations that can be re-bound to physical addresses         as required or expedient.4.  USER SERVICES   The user services of the network are a key aspect of making the   network directly useful to the scientist.  Without the right user   services, network users separate into artificial subclasses based on   their degree of sophistication in acquiring skill in the use of the   network.  Flexible information dissemination equalizes the   effectiveness of the network for different kinds of users.Near Term Requirements   In the near term, the focus is on providing the services that allow   users to take advantage of the functions that the interconnected   network provides.Directory services   Much of the information necessary in the use of the network is for   directory purposes.  The user needs to access resources available on   the network, and needs to obtain a name or address.White Pages   The network needs to provide mechanisms for looking up names and   addresses of people and hosts on the network.  Flexible searches   should be possible on multiple aspects of the directory listing.   Some of these services are normally transparent to the user/host name   to address translation for example.Leiner                                                         [Page 15]RFC 1017          Requirements for Scientific Research       August 1987Yellow Pages   Other kinds of information lookup are based on cataloging and   classification of information about resources on the networks.Information Sharing Services      Bulletin Boards         The service of the electronic bulletin board is the one-to-many         analog of the one-to-one service of electronic mail.  A         bulletin board provides a forum for discussion and interchange         of information.  Accessibility is network-wide depending on the         definition of the particular bulletin board.  Currently the         SMTP and UUCP protocols are used in the transport of postings         for many bulletin boards, but any similar electronic mail         transport can be substituted without affecting the underlying         concept.  An effectively open-ended recipient list is specified         as the recipient of a message, which then constitutes a         bulletin board posting.  A convention exists as to what         transport protocols are utilized for a particular set of         bulletin boards.  The user agent used to access the Bulletin         Board may vary from host to host.  Some number of host         resources on the network provide the service of progressively         expanding the symbolic mail address of the Bulletin Board into         its constituent parts, as well as relaying postings as a         service to the network.  Associated with this service is the         maintenance of the lists used in distributing the postings.         This maintenance includes responding to requests from Bulletin         Board readers and host Bulletin Board managers, as well as         drawing the appropriate conclusions from recurring         automatically generated or error messages in response to         distribution attempts.      Community Archiving         Much information can be shared over the network.  At some point         each particular information item reaches the stage where it is         no longer appropriately kept online and accessible.  When         moving a file of information to offline storage, a network can         provide its hosts a considerable economy if information of         interest to several of them need only be stored offline once.         Procedures then exist for querying and retrieving from the set         of offline stored files.      Shared/distributed file system         It should be possible for a user on the network to look at aLeiner                                                         [Page 16]RFC 1017          Requirements for Scientific Research       August 1987         broadly defined collection of information on the network as one         useful whole.  To this end, standards for accessing files         remotely are necessary.  These standards should include means         for random access to remote files, similar to the generally         employed on a single computer system.      Distributed Databases and Archives         As more scientific disciplines computerize their data archives         and catalogs, mechanisms will have to be provided to support         distributed access to these resources.  Fundamentally new kins         of collaborative research will become possible when such         resources and access mechanisms are widely available.      Resource Sharing Services         In sharing the resources or services available on the network,         certain ancillary services are needed depending on the         resource.Access Control   Identification and authorization is needed for individuals, hosts or   subnetworks permitted to make use of a resource available via the   network.  There should be consistency of procedure for obtaining and   utilizing permission for use of shared resources.  The identification   scheme used for access to the network should be available for use by   resources as well.  In some cases, this will serve as sufficient   access control, and in other cases it will be a useful adjunct to   resource-specific controls.  The information on the current network   location of the user should be available along with information on   user identification to permit added flexibility for resources.  For   example, it should be possible to verify that an access attempt is   coming from within a state.  A state agency might then grant public   access to its services only for users within the state.  Attributes   of individuals should be codifiable within the access control   database, for example membership in a given professional society.Privacy   Users of a resource have a right to expect that they have control   over the release of the information they generate.  Resources should   allow classifying information according to degree of access, i.e.   none, access to read, access according to criteria specified in the   data itself, ability to change or add information.  The full range of   identification information described under access control should be   available to the user when specifying access.  Access could be   granted to all fellow members of a professional society, for example.Leiner                                                         [Page 17]RFC 1017          Requirements for Scientific Research       August 1987Accounting   To permit auditing of usage, accounting information should be   provided for those resources for which it is deemed necessary.  This   would include identity of the user of the resource and the   corresponding volume of resource components.Legalities of Interagency Research Internet   To make the multiply-sponsored internetwork feasible, the federal   budget will have to recognize that some usage outside a particular   budget category may occur.  This will permit the cross-utilization of   agency funded resources.  For example, NSFnet researchers would be   able to access supercomputers over NASnet.  In return for this, the   total cost to the government will be significantly reduced because of   the benefits of sharing network and other resources, rather than   duplicating them.Standards   In order for the networking needs of scientific computing to be met,   new standards are going to evolve.  It is important that they be   tested under actual use conditions, and that feedback be used to   refine them.  Since the standards for scientific communication and   networking are to be experimented with, they are more dynamic than   those in other electronic communication fields.  It is critical that   the resources of the network be expended to promulgate experimental   standards and maximize the range of the community utilizing them.  To   this end, the sharing of results of the testing is important.User-oriented Documentation   The functionality of the network should be available widely without   the costly need to refer requests to experts for formulation.  A   basic information facility in the network should therefore be   developed.  The network should be self-documenting via online help   files, interactive tutorials, and good design.  In addition, concise,   well-indexed and complete printed documentation should be available.Future Goals   The goal for the future should be to provide the advanced user   services that allow full advantage to be taken of the interconnection   of users, computing resources, data bases, and experimental   facilities.  One major goal would be the creation of a national   knowledge bank.  Such a knowledge bank would capture and organize   computer-based knowledge in various scientific fields that is   currently available only in written/printed form, or in the minds ofLeiner                                                         [Page 18]RFC 1017          Requirements for Scientific Research       August 1987   experts or experienced workers in the field.  This knowledge would be   stored in knowledge banks which will be accessible over the network   to individual researchers and their programs.  The result will be a   codification of scientific understanding and technical know-how in a   series of knowledge based systems which would become increasingly   capable over time.CONCLUSION   In this paper, we have tried to describe the functions required of   the interconnected national network to support scientific research.   These functions range from basic connectivity through to the   provision for powerful distributed user services.   Many of the goals described in this paper are achievable with current   technology.  They require coordination of the various networking   activities, agreement to share costs and technologies, and agreement   to use common protocols and standards in the provision of those   functions.  Other goals require further research, where the   coordination of the efforts and sharing of results will be key to   making those results available to the scientific user.   For these reasons, we welcome the initiative represented by this   workshop to have the government agencies join forces in providing the   best network facilities possible in support of scientific research.APPENDIX                Internet Task Force on Scientific Computing             Rick Adrion     University of Massachusetts             Ron Bailey      NASA Ames Research Center             Rick Bogart     Stanford University             Bob Brown       RIACS             Dave Farber     University of Delaware             Alan Katz       USC Information Science Institute             Jim Leighton    Lawrence Livermore Laboratories             Keith Lantz     Stanford University             Barry Leiner    (chair) RIACS             Milo Medin      NASA Ames Research Center             Mike Muuss      US Army Ballistics Research Laboratory             Harvey Newman   California Institute of Technology             David Roode     Intellicorp             Ari Ollikainen  General Electric             Peter Shames    Space Telescope Science Institute             Phil Scherrer   Stanford UniversityLeiner                                                         [Page 19]

⌨️ 快捷键说明

复制代码Ctrl + C
搜索代码Ctrl + F
全屏模式F11
增大字号Ctrl + =
减小字号Ctrl + -
显示快捷键?