⭐ 欢迎来到虫虫下载站! | 📦 资源下载 📁 资源专辑 ℹ️ 关于我们
⭐ 虫虫下载站

📄 rfc1360.txt

📁 著名的RFC文档,其中有一些文档是已经翻译成中文的的.
💻 TXT
📖 第 1 页 / 共 5 页
字号:
RFC 1360                     IAB Standards                September 1992          is needed and if so by whom.  RFC Editor decides to publish or          not.   Of course, in all cases the RFC Editor can request or make minor   changes for style, format, and presentation purposes.   The IESG has designated the IESG Secretary as its agent for   forwarding documents with IESG approval and for registering concerns   in response to notifications (5) to the RFC Editor.  Documents from   Area Directors or Working Group Chairs may be considered in the same   way as documents from "other".5.2.  The Standards Track Diagram   There is a part of the STATUS and STATE categorization that is called   the standards track.  Actually, only the changes of state are   significant to the progression along the standards track, though the   status assignments may be changed as well.   The states illustrated by single line boxes are temporary states,   those illustrated by double line boxes are long term states.  A   protocol will normally be expected to remain in a temporary state for   several months (minimum six months for proposed standard, minimum   four months for draft standard).  A protocol may be in a long term   state for many years.   A protocol may enter the standards track only on the recommendation   of the IESG and by action of the IAB; and may move from one state to   another along the track only on the recommendation of the IESG and by   action of the IAB.  That is, it takes both the IESG and the IAB to   either start a protocol on the track or to move it along.   Generally, as the protocol enters the standards track a decision is   made as to the eventual STATUS, requirement level or applicability   (elective, recommended, or required) the protocol will have, although   a somewhat less stringent current status may be assigned, and it then   is placed in the the proposed standard STATE with that status.  So   the initial placement of a protocol is into state 1.  At any time the   STATUS decision may be revisited.Internet Architecture Board                                    [Page 12]RFC 1360                     IAB Standards                September 1992         |         +<----------------------------------------------+         |                                               ^         V    0                                          |    4   +-----------+                                   +===========+   |   enter   |-->----------------+-------------->|experiment |   +-----------+                   |               +=====+=====+                                   |                     |                                   V    1                |                             +-----------+               V                             | proposed  |-------------->+                        +--->+-----+-----+               |                        |          |                     |                        |          V    2                |                        +<---+-----+-----+               V                             | draft std |-------------->+                        +--->+-----+-----+               |                        |          |                     |                        |          V    3                |                        +<---+=====+=====+               V                             | standard  |-------------->+                             +=====+=====+               |                                                         |                                                         V    5                                                   +=====+=====+                                                   | historic  |                                                   +===========+   The transition from proposed standard (1) to draft standard (2) can   only be by action of the IAB on the recommendation of the IESG and   only after the protocol has been proposed standard (1) for at least   six months.   The transition from draft standard (2) to standard (3) can only be by   action of the IAB on the recommendation of the IESG and only after   the protocol has been draft standard (2) for at least four months.   Occasionally, the decision may be that the protocol is not ready for   standardization and will be assigned to the experimental state (4).   This is off the standards track, and the protocol may be resubmitted   to enter the standards track after further work.  There are other   paths into the experimental and historic states that do not involve   IAB action.   Sometimes one protocol is replaced by another and thus becomes   historic, or it may happen that a protocol on the standards track is   in a sense overtaken by another protocol (or other events) and   becomes historic (state 5).Internet Architecture Board                                    [Page 13]RFC 1360                     IAB Standards                September 19926.  The Protocols   Subsection 6.1 lists recent RFCs and other changes.  Subsections 6.2   - 6.9 list the standards in groups by protocol state.6.1.  Recent Changes6.1.1.  New RFCs:      1361 - Simple Network Time Protocol (SNTP)             This is an information document and does not specify any             level of standard.      1360 - This memo.      1359 - Connecting to the Internet What Connecting Institutions             Should Anticipate             This is an information document and does not specify any             level of standard.      1358 - Charter of the Internet Architecture Board (IAB)             This is an information document and does not specify any             level of standard.      1357 - A Format for E-mailing Bibliographic Records             This is an information document and does not specify any             level of standard.      1356 - Multiprotocol Interconnect on X.25 and ISDN in the Packet             Mode             A Proposed Standard protocol.      1355 - Privacy and Accuracy Issues in Network Information Center             Databases             This is an information document and does not specify any             level of standard.      1354 - IP Forwarding Table MIB             A Proposed Standard protocol.Internet Architecture Board                                    [Page 14]RFC 1360                     IAB Standards                September 1992      1353 - Definitions of Managed Objects for Administration of SNMP             Parties             A Proposed Standard protocol.      1352 - SNMP Security Protocols             A Proposed Standard protocol.      1351 - SNMP Administrative Model             A Proposed Standard protocol.      1350 - The TFTP Protocol (Revision 2)             A Standard protocol.      1349 - Type of Service in the Internet Protocol Suite             A Proposed Standard protocol.      1348 - DNS NSAP RRs             An Experimental protocol.      1347 - TCP and UDP with Bigger Addresses (TUBA), A Simple Proposal             for Internet Addressing and Routing             This is an information document and does not specify any             level of standard.      1346 - Resource Allocation, Control, and Accounting for the Use of             Network Resources             This is an information document and does not specify any             level of standard.      1345 - Character Mnemonics & Character Sets             This is an information document and does not specify any             level of standard.      1344 - Implications of MIME for Internet Mail Gateways             This is an information document and does not specify any             level of standard.Internet Architecture Board                                    [Page 15]RFC 1360                     IAB Standards                September 1992      1343 - A User Agent Configuration Mechanism For Multimedia Mail             Format Information             This is an information document and does not specify any             level of standard.      1342 - Representation of Non-ASCII Text in Internet Message             Headers             A Proposed Standard protocol.      1341 - MIME (Multipurpose Internet Mail Extensions): Mechanisms             for Specifying and Describing the Format of Internet             Message Bodies             A Proposed Standard protocol.      1340 - Assigned Numbers             This is an information document and does not specify any             level of standard.      1339 - Remote Mail Checking Protocol             An Experimental protocol.      1338 - Supernetting: an Address Assignment and Aggregation             Strategy             This is an information document and does not specify any             level of standard.      1337 - TIME-WAIT Assassination Hazards in TCP             This is an information document and does not specify any             level of standard.      1336 - Who's Who in the Internet - Biographies of IAB, IESG and             IRSG Members             This is an information document and does not specify any             level of standard.      1335 - A Two-Tier Address Structure for the Internet: A Solution             to the Problem of Address Space Exhaustion             This is an information document and does not specify any             level of standard.Internet Architecture Board                                    [Page 16]RFC 1360                     IAB Standards                September 1992      1334 - Not yet issued.      1333 - PPP Link Quality Monitoring             A Proposed Standard protocol.      1332 - The PPP Internet Protocol Control Protocol (IPCP)             A Proposed Standard protocol.      1331 - The Point-to-Point Protocol (PPP) for the Transmission of             Multi-protocol Datagrams over Point-to-Point Links             A Proposed Standard protocol.      1330 - Recommendations for the Phase I Deployment of OSI Directory             Services (X.500) and OSI Message Handling Services (X.400)             This is an information document and does not specify any             level of standard.      1329 - Thoughts on Address Resolution for Dual MAC FDDI Networks             This is an information document and does not specify any             level of standard.

⌨️ 快捷键说明

复制代码 Ctrl + C
搜索代码 Ctrl + F
全屏模式 F11
切换主题 Ctrl + Shift + D
显示快捷键 ?
增大字号 Ctrl + =
减小字号 Ctrl + -